Let’s break down, get rid of the artificial barriers between not-for-profit arts and commercial arts. This artificial designation does us no good, as it causes internal sector strife, and confusion and misunderstanding among the public.
There’s plenty of really cheesy not-for-profit art, and plenty of high quality commercial art. Examples surely pop into your head as you think about this. That a dichotomy emerged out of the “501c3 movement” is still hard to understand: that not-for-profit = quality art (or even worse, “high art”) and that commercial art = low quality art. It’s easy to reduce this equation. If it sells, it must be bad and vice versa.
So, knowing that the premise is fatally flawed, and that maintaining it is unhealthy to our field, let’s actively work to break down barriers this coming year.
But how?
Open your eyes and attend several of the “other” side’s work. Interact with your “opponent.” Seek opportunities to speak to the issue. Find partnerships that make sense artistically and financially. And perhaps high on the scale would be creating new ventures that optimize the advantages of both organizational models. Check out World Cafe Live in Philadelphia, where Hal Real, their creator, has constructed a commercial/not-for-profit combo of (www.worldcafelive.com) and www.liveconnections.org.
Do you know of any visual arts organizations or museums that take advantage of both organizational models like the world cafe live? I’m doing some research on alternative business models with in the visual arts and could use some help with fining such organizations. Thanks