Watch Edward Snowden speaking to Glenn Greenwald. According to the British newspaper The Guardian:
Snowden will go down in history as one of America’s most consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning. He is responsible for handing over material from one of the world’s most secretive organisations – the NSA.
In a note accompanying the first set of documents he provided, he wrote: “I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions,” but “I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant.”
And read this Q&A with Snowden about “why he carried out the biggest intelligence leak in a generation– and what comes next.”
Postscript: June 10 — Bill Osborne’s comment says what needed to be said:
The abuse of Julian Assange and Bradley Manning was designed to intimidate whistle blowers like Edward Snowden. It is good to see that at least in this case it has not worked.
We should soon expect a campaign of character assassination against Snowden similar to the ones conducted against Assange and Manning.
The most interesting thing about Bill’s comment is that he offers more than just a probing opinion. Typically, he gives striking information. For which my thanks. Yours, too, I hope. A clarification is needed, however, for this:
It’s telling that the exposé and interviews appeared in a foreign paper. We can no longer count on our own media to report the revelations of whistle blowers.
Yes, the American press alone cannot be relied upon to give us undiluted or unbiased news of U.S. gummint surveillance, intimidation, and so forth — partly because too many reporters simply repeat official “talking points” without challenging them, as Greenwald has often noted, but in larger part because corporate media have a craven, vested interest in maintaining good relations with the gummint. But credit where due: The Washington Post has been on the Snowden story from the beginning. The fact that Snowden’s information was leaked to The Guardian first and foremost is because Snowden trusted Greenwald, and The Guardian is where Greenwald’s column appears. It must be said, of course, that no mainstream American newspaper would likely carry Greenwald’s column, especially given the unfettered editorial authority he demands (and deserves).
Update: June 11 — In today’s NYT: “Guardian Makes Waves, and Is Ready for More.”
Mr. Greenwald said that his source, who on Sunday identified himself as Edward J. Snowden, “knew the views that I had” and “knew that in order for someone to do this story the way it had to be done” he had to be “in an adversarial posture vis-à-vis the U.S. government.”
Barton Gellman, an investigative reporter who had a long career at The Washington Post, said Mr. Snowden also discussed the documents with him. But he balked when Mr. Gellman and The Post would not agree to Mr. Snowden’s timetable for releasing the documents or his request that the paper print all the slides in a PowerPoint presentation about Prism, the government’s extensive online surveillance system.
Laura Poitras, a documentary filmmaker who shared a byline with Mr. Greenwald in The Guardian and Mr. Gellman in The Post in the coverage of the N.S.A. leaks, said in an interview with Salon that Mr. Snowden “had a suspicion of mainstream media.”
Wow. Thanks for directing us to that. What a great young guy (and couple of great guys). There are still heroes in the world.
Its telling that the expose and Interviews appeared in a foreign paper. We can no longer count on our own media to report the revelations of whistle blowers.
The abuse of Julian Assange and Bradley Manning was designed to intimidate whistle blowers like Edward Snowden. It is good to see that at least in this case it has not worked.
We should soon expect a campaign of character assassination against Snowden similar to the ones conducted against Assange and Manning.
This sort of massive and detailed surveillance is not new. From 1982 to 1990, I lived near a large US army base near Bad Aibling, Germany called ESHELON Field Station 81 that had about 1000 staff members. It was part of a worldwide network of stations whose mission was to intercept commercial satellite trunk communications, fiber optic switching stations, microwave communications, etc. They used massive software programs to sort, categorize, and store this information similar to Carnivore, which were later replaced by programs like NarusInsight run on super computers.
These bases were initially created to monitor military and diplomatic communications of the Soviet Union, but their principle function eventually became industrial espionage against America’s allies. Narus, which owns NarusInsight, is a subsidiary of Boeing. Ironically, Airbus has been one of the best known targets of this industrial espionage.
The European Union has conducted parliamentary investigations of ECHELON, but to little avail. As part of the reorganization of the intelligence services after 9/11, the base at Bad Aibling was closed in 2004 and its work transferred to Griesheim, Germany. The base at Griesheim was closed in 2008 and the work transferred to another location, but I do not know where.
The surveillance of Americans, of course, is not new. I doubt these latest revelations will trigger much resistance. This is unfortunate because surveillance and secrecy are ultimately measures of totalitarianism.