In his presidential memoir, “A World
Transformed,” written with his national security adviser, Brent
Scowcroft, and published five years ago, George Bush the Elder explained why U.S. forces didn’t
go after Saddam Hussein at the end of Gulf War I:
Trying to eliminate Saddam … would have incurred incalculable human andIf only Shrub the Son could read.
political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible…. We would have been forced to
occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq…. There was no viable “exit strategy” we could see,
violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a
pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus
unilaterally exceeding the United Nations’ mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of
international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route,
the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile
land.
