• Home
  • About
    • Engaging Matters
    • Doug Borwick
    • Backstory-Ground Rules
    • Contact
  • Resources
    • Building Communities, Not Audiences
    • Engage Now! A Guide to Making the Arts Indispensable
  • EM’s List
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Engaging Matters

Doug Borwick on vibrant arts and communities

Community Philanthropy

April 28, 2012 by Doug Borwick

I have for a number of years felt like an ambassador serving as liaison between the arts world and the broader not-for-profit world. (This comes from my roles as director of an arts management degree program as well as director of a not-for-profit management degree program.) To some that seems like an odd thing to say. “Aren’t the arts a part of the not-for-profit world?” In a technical, legal sense, yes. However, there have, at least until lately, been few members of the arts community that have seen themselves as having common cause with the rest of the not-for-profit establishment, especially social service agencies. The first few years I attended conferences of the North Carolina Center for Nonprofits (Shout-out: These are always among the best organized learning experiences I’ve found in conference settings), I and a small handful of others were very lonely at the “arts interest group” lunch table. This is one reason that serious engagement involving collaboration between arts and non-arts agencies can be so difficult: there’s no history of interaction.

But all of this is simply preamble to the content of this post. What interests me here is a commentary on shifts in the philanthropic world that I only saw because I have a foot in the not-for-profit pool. (Oddly disconcerting metaphor, I know.) Recently, an article in The Nonprofit Quarterly (Another shout-out: One of the best journals on any topic, bar none), Community Philanthropy: It’s Not Just for the Wealthy Anymore, dealt with the fundraising aspects of serious community engagement. Beginning with an international perspective, focusing on philanthropy in the developing world, the article discusses shifts both in focus and in results when communities and their welfare are seen as the core of philanthropy. The article begins by saying:

Until somewhat recently in the U.S., community foundations were pretty much the province of the wealthy. The same goes for the rest of institutional philanthropy—family foundations, donor-advised funds, etc. But something may be happening to community philanthropy in the U.S. and around the world that reflects the “mutuality of philanthropy,” the sense that “community philanthropy is for everyone,” according to Nick Deychakiwsky, senior program officer of the C.S. Mott Foundation.

In particular, the article cites Tewa, a Nepalese foundation with 3,000 donors, at least some of whom are also recipients. This model creates some problems (both cultural and practical) in connecting with traditional, top-down development agencies. However,  incorporating local voices into the mix presents the potential for a great leap forward in impact. The World Bank is struggling with how to respond to local initiatives like Tewa. The article acknowledges that local does not necessarily mean “better.” Sometimes local efforts reinforce, through inertia, existing power structures–the status quo. But they also offer real opportunities for supporting solutions well-suited to on-the-ground reality, unimaginable by remote financiers.

But Engaging Matters, for better of worse, focuses on the arts in the U.S. What’s the point of this? I have argued (and continue to do so) that engaging with communities will provide us access to more and different kinds of funds than has ever been possible to date. Crowdsourced funding (a Web 2.0 version of what the NQ article is discussing) is one of those options. The article identifies “an emerging U.S. transition from community foundations into community development philanthropy. ‘It’s not giving just to do good . . .but giving for change.’ The key is not (or not just) how much money is being raised and distributed . . . but ‘how many people are giving, how many people are involved in the governance. . . Participation . . .is the new endowment.'” [Reader beware: if tapping new funding sources is the only motivation for change, it will not work. To be successful, engagement must be systemic. This potential new approach to funding is simply one of the many side benefits of engagement.]

The ultimate point, for the purposes here, is found in one of the closing statements: “community philanthropy in the sense of ‘local people helping each other, by sharing resources for the common good,’ is a naturally occurring asset, found in all communities and cultures, and encouraged by all major religions and traditions.” Where arts organizations are positioned as community members working shoulder-to-shoulder with others to make lives better, they will be able to participate in this new form of community philanthropy. This will not be possible for business-as-usual arts organizations. But for those seriously committed to substantive engagement, it will.

Engage!

Doug

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Arts 2.0

About Doug Borwick

Doug Borwick is a past President of the Board of the Association of Arts Administration Educators and was for nearly 30 years Director of the Arts Management and Not-for-Profit Management Programs at Salem College in Winston-Salem, NC. He is CEO of Outfitters4, Inc., providing management services to nonprofit organizations and ArtsEngaged providing training and consultation to artists and arts organization to help them more effectively engage with their communities. [Read More …]

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,552 other subscribers

About Engaging Matters

The arts began as collective activity around the campfire, expressions of community. In a very real sense, the community owned that expression. Over time, with increasing specialization of labor, the arts– especially Western “high arts”– became … [Read More...]

Books

Community Engagement: Why and How

Building Communities, Not Audiences: The Future of the Arts in the United States Engage Now! A Guide to Making the Arts Indispensable[Purchase info below] I have to be honest, I haven’t finished it yet because I’m constantly having to digest the ‘YES’ and ‘AMEN’ moments I get from each … [Read More...]

Gard Foundation Calls for Stories

The Robert E. Gard Foundation is dedicated to fostering healthy communities through arts-based development, it is currently seeking stories from communities in which the arts have improved the lives of citizens in remarkable ways. These stories can either be full descriptions (400-900 words) with photos, video, and web links or mini stories (ca. 200 words) […]

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Jerry Yoshitomi on Deserving Attention: “Doug: Thank you very much for this. I am assuming that much of the local sports coverage is of high…” Mar 25, 16:28
  • Alan Harrison on Deadly Sin: II: ““Yes, but it’s Shakespeare!” is a phrase I heard for years in defending the production of the poetry from several…” Feb 17, 19:38
  • Doug Borwick on Deadly Sin: I: “Excellent question.” Feb 11, 16:08
  • Jerry Yoshitomi on Deadly Sin: I: “When I first came into the field and I met our leadership, it seemed to me that ‘arrogance’ was a…” Feb 10, 15:36
  • Doug Borwick on Cutting Back: “Thanks for the kind words. Hope you are well.” Oct 2, 06:58

Tags

arrogance artcentricity artists arts board of directors business model change community community engagement creativity dance diversity education equity evaluation examples excellence funding fundraising future governance gradualism implementation inclusion instrumental international Intrinsic mainstreaming management marketing mission museums music participation partnership programming public good public policy relationships research Robert E. Gard Foundation simplicity structure terminology theatre
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in