FOR a not terribly good book, “the witches of eastwick” has had quite an afterlife. not only did it become a popular, if faintly cheesy, movie involving cher, and a briefly lived stage show, but it’s now set to become a television series. no, not a miniseries — but a show that could run for years and years.
why? i’m still a bit confused about the whole thing. but HERE is my new piece on the book’s unlikely journey.
for the story, i spoke to a producer on the show named maggie friedman, who pointed out that “men and women and sex” are important ingredients to making the book — and her show — work.
and i discussed the original novel’s impact and sexual politics — is it feminist? misogynist? an indictment of the counterculture — with scholars quentin miller and sam cohen. the latter has a new book coming soon called “after the end of history: american fiction in the 1990s.”
what do people make of the program of “eastwick?” i’m eager to hear from viewers. the show kicks of wednesday.
Signs and signage – road signs, movie marquees, newspaper headlines real and imaginary, municipal signs, electronic message boards, storefronts, etc. – function as important indicators of the shifts, changes, and developments in Angstrom’s consciousness as he grows older throughout the decades chronicled in Updike’s ‘Rabbit’ series.
http://postmoderndeconstructionmadhouse.blogspot.com/2013/12/signs-and-signage-in-updikes-rabbit.html#.UyN2cj9dXxA