• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

What’s your U-Index?

April 8, 2008 by Andrew Taylor

Jonathan Clements in the Wall Street Journal explores the connection between the way we spend our time and our sense of well-being. His reference point is a new study entitled ”National time accounting: The currency of life” (abstract here, full PDF download here). The authors asked participants to track how they spent their day, and then to reflect on their emotional state for those activities (happy, tired, stressed, sad, interested, pain).

Clements finds most interesting the implication that one cluster of activities ranked higher on happiness and lower on stress than the others. Says he:

The standout cluster was what the authors label “engaging leisure and spiritual activities,” things like visiting friends, exercising, attending church, listening to music, fishing, reading a book, sitting in a cafe or going to a party. When we spend time on our favorite of these activities, we’re typically happy, engrossed and not especially stressed….

The obvious implication: If we devote more time to these activities, maybe we would be more satisfied with our lives. Yet the evidence suggests we’ve missed a huge chance to do just that — which may help explain why Americans are little or no happier than they were four decades ago.

While Clements focuses on that particular cluster (and arts managers probably should, as well), I’m rather fond of the others in the list, comprising the following six:

  1. unpleasant personal maintenance
    personal medical care, homework, financial/government services, etc.

  2. moderately enjoyable tasks
    writing by hand, purchasing routine goods, walking, etc.

  3. engaging leisure and spiritual activities
    conversation, reading books, travel related to consumption, in-home social activities, out-of-home leisure, etc.

  4. neutral downtime and cooking
    watching television, food preparation, gardening, relaxing, doing nothing, etc.

  5. mundane chores
    laundry, ironing, cleaning, dressing, personal care, etc.

  6. work-like activities
    home or vehicle repairs, schooling, main paid work, care of older children, etc.

Despite the positive returns, the average percent of each day spent on ”engaging leisure and spiritual activites” has declined since 1965, and the average percent of ”neutral downtime and cooking” has increased. The study contains lots of detailed analysis, by gender, weather, social activity, and even day of the week. Well worth a browse of the tables at the end of the full report.

Another favorite measure in the study is the ”U-Index,” defined as ”the proportion of time an individual spends in an unpleasant state” [no jokes about New Jersey, please]. I can just imagine a competition among arts and cultural managers to see who can achieve the highest U-Index, even when working in a field they claim to love — stress and fatigue being among our primary indicators of professional success.

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. Nick says

    April 9, 2008 at 5:43 am

    More to the point, consider the implications for marketing to arts audiences, using the study for a greater understanding of the claims that can be made.

  2. Rebecca says

    April 9, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    This calls to mind Faith Popcorn’s theory of “Cocooning” — the notion that people now choose to spend their down time at home rather than engaging with the public through civic/arts related interests. Its definitely a marketing/audience development issue in the performing arts — as ticket prices increase, we have to fight even harder to get people to leave home at night/on the weekends.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • Minimum viable everything July 1, 2025
    Getting better as an arts organization doesn't always (or even often) mean getting bigger.
  • The rise and stall of the nonprofit arts June 24, 2025
    The modern arts nonprofit evolved in an ecology of growth. It's time to evolve again.
  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?
  • Flip the script on your money narrative June 3, 2025
    Your income statement tells the tale of how (and why) money drives your business. Don't share the wrong story.

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in