The National Performing Arts Convention has started to post the results of its final Town Hall meeting over on their convention weblog. These are the categories and strategies presented during the massive final meeting of the convention, and voted on by some 1300 conventioners. The three-day process leading up to this final event included large caucuses of convention conversations — tables of 8 to 10 participants from different disciplines, clustered in rooms throughout the venue. Each of these caucuses explored a specific question, and all of those answers bubbled up to a ”theme team” that selected the most mentioned responses to feed into the next day’s conversation.
The goal was to collaboratively develop three primary categories of action to improve the state and status of the performing arts in the United States, and then to generate and select two or three primary strategies within each of those categories at the national, local/regional, and organizational level.
While these goals and strategies may seem broad and vague, they generated some wonderfully specific conversation at the table I was observing during the Town Hall. I hope the weblog posting, and opportunity to comment, captures a portion of this nuance and texture.
Meanwhile, blogger Doug Fox has posted a critique of the convention’s use (or limited use) of communications technologies and blogger networks in spreading the conversation beyond the physical space in Denver. Good points about the convening, as well as the on-line capacity of our industry.
Doug Fox says
Thanks for describing how the process worked during the Town Meeting at NPAC and, of course, thanks for linking to my post about the conference Internet strategy.
What are your overall thoughts about the effectiveness of the AmericaSpeaks process?
Greg Sandow, who like me was not there, wrote that no consideration was given to the real-world feasibility of implementing the voted upon strategies.
http://www.artsjournal.com/sandow/2008/06/hall_of_mirrors.html
Drew McManus wrote that voting reflected the delegates’ desire for “‘Messiah-centric’ solutions.”
http://www.adaptistration.com/adaptistration/2008/06/npac-2008-the-g.html
And Molly Sheridan wrote that participants didn’t have enough time to grasp the issues.
http://www.artsjournal.com/gap/2008/06/the-government-we-deserve.html
Personally, I think much more emphasis should have been devoted to how the performing arts community can embrace the grassroots nature of the Internet.
http://greatdance.com/thekineticinterface/2008/06/grassroots-internet-strategy-performing-arts/
It’s nice reading a lot of different viewpoints from people who were and were not at conference.
Best,
Doug Fox