Previous:
From C-Monster:
The graffiti artist who stole a buncha pencils from a Hirst installation at the Tate Modern is now threatening to sharpen them.
In response to my reposting C-Monster, an artist emailed me:
That’s cute, Regina, but you’re missing the point. One artist vandalized the work of another. The pencils aren’t just pencils, any more than Claes Oldenburg’s bat is just a bat. In a more rational world than the one shaping up online, art critics would support the artist, not the vandal.
I think it’s worth remembering that Damien Hirst started this fight when he took teenage street artist Cartrain to court for copyright infringement, and, in an astonishing miscarriage of justice, won.
Copyright? Cartrain’s collages are satires.
An example of what Cartrain was forced to hand over to Hirst’s lawyers, posted by Jonathan Jones:
I love Hirst’s work, but he’s in danger of becoming the Dick Cheney of the art world.
As Jones wrote:
Damien Hirst‘s feud with teenage street artist Cartrain could yet become the most controversial story of Hirst’s career.
It really is vile for a rich man to use his power to bully someone who,
after all, is just trying to emulate him by making art with found
materials.Presumably, what irks Hirst is that Cartrain used
Hirst’s diamond skull in a series of collaged portraits of the skull’s
creator. Hirst successfully demanded that all the young artist’s works
incorporating the diamond skull should be handed over, presumably to be destroyed. (more)
(That’s two presumablys in one paragraph. Doesn’t the Guardian employ editors?) Of course Cartrain should give Hirst back his dick pencils. But Hirst needs to stop being such a dick. One Cheney is more than enough.