Archives for December 6, 2013

In today’s Wall Street Journal drama column I report enthusiastically on two A.R. Gurney productions, the premiere in New York of Family Furniture and a Boston revival of The Cocktail Party. Here’s an excerpt.
* * *
To be prolific is to be uneven. A.R. Gurney has written a lot of plays in the past decade, some of them good, others less so, but none quite so fine as the ones that won him a permanent place in the history of American theater. So I rejoice to report that his newest play, “Family Furniture,” is exactly that fine–and that its distinguished author is 83 years old. Not since 1995 and “Sylvia” has Mr. Gurney given us so penetrating and disciplined a play.
“Family Furniture” is a exceptionally well-cast, somewhat longish one-act play (long enough that I think it might possibly profit from being performed with an intermission) that starts out at a gallop and moves unswervingly to its stark, sad conclusion. Four of the five characters are members of a family of WASPs from upstate New York that is sitting on a secret, which is that the mother (Carolyn McCormick) appears to be sleeping with one of their neighbors behind the back of her stuffy, seemingly oblivious husband (Peter Scolari). The children (Andrew Keenan-Bolger and Ismenia Mendes) are appalled, while the son’s Jewish girlfriend (Molly Nordin) thinks that they ought to force the affair out into the open.
Those are the cards in Mr. Gurney’s hand–most of them, anyway–and he plays them with enviable skill, triggering a string of surprises in the second half that up the ante considerably. But “Family Furniture” is not a family melodrama: It’s a Terence Rattigan-like tale of strong but largely unspoken emotions, and the penny-plain simplicity of Thomas Kail’s production (which is played on a near-bare stage in a 74-seat Off-Broadway house) brings us close enough to the characters to feel each twinge of their collective pain….
In a happy coincidence, the Huntington Theatre Company is mounting a superior revival of “The Cocktail Hour,” the 1988 play in which Mr. Gurney cemented the reputation for excellence that he had won in 1982 with “The Dining Room.” It’s a quasi-autobiographical comedy with a Pirandello-like twist in which an angry young playwright (James Waterston) comes home to Buffalo to inform his horrified family (Maureen Anderman, Pamela J. Gray and Richard Poe) that he has just written a play about them called (naturally) “The Cocktail Hour.” The plot is not altogether unlike that of “Family Furniture,” but it’s played for laughs and ends in what the aggressively genial father, played to perfection by Mr. Poe, calls “an appreciative mood.”…
* * *
Read the whole thing here.

In today’s Wall Street Journal “Sightings” column I reflect on the novels of Elmore Leonard and the limitations of pop culture. Here’s an excerpt.
* * *
When Elmore Leonard died in August, the papers were full of obituaries that described him as “a novelist who made crime an art.” So, at any rate, declared a headline writer for the New York Times. A year earlier, the National Book Foundation had presented Mr. Leonard with its annual medal for “distinguished contribution to American letters,” calling him a “great American author,” and the Library of America announced that it would be bringing out a three-volume edition of his work in 2014. I didn’t want to rain on his cortege, so I didn’t say what I thought, which was that he was one of the most overpraised writers of our time. A very good one, mind you–I’m a passionate fan of Mr. Leonard’s brisk, funny crime novels–but overpraised all the same.
What’s wrong with his books? For one thing, they’re repetitious to a fault. I can’t count the number of Mr. Leonard’s novels that revolve around a divorced man of a certain age who falls hard for a wised-up younger woman. On the other hand, a cheeseburger is a cheeseburger. No matter how many you’ve eaten, you can usually make room for another one if it’s good, and Mr. Leonard wrote a lot of good books, “LaBrava,” “Maximum Bob” and “Tishomingo Blues” in particular.
So why grump about his obituaries? Because they exemplify a trend that has gotten out of hand. It used to be that we didn’t take popular culture seriously, but now we don’t take anything else seriously….
The problem is not that pop culture doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously. It’s that a culture totally dominated by popular art is by definition limited. Let’s go back to Elmore Leonard’s novels for a moment. Sure, they’re superbly crafted, but they’re all pure melodramas whose subject is crime, with a little romance thrown in for seasoning. So, almost without exception, are the TV series that have come of late to be widely regarded as the best that America’s storytellers have to offer. From “Hill Street Blues” to “The Sopranos” to “Breaking Bad,” these series are all thrillers of one kind or another. To be sure, they use the time-honored conventions of genre fiction to explore many other aspects of American life–but in the end, somebody always gets shot, just as a pop song, no matter how good it may be, is almost always three minutes long….
* * *
Read the whole thing here.

“Even a Saint finds it hard, now and again, to be quite sure why he is doing a thing. It is unlikely that such an one will be completely deluded as to his motive, let alone do something with a consciously wrong motive; but the anguish of life is, that a good man finds he is doing things with mixed motives.”
C.C. Martindale, The Vocation of Aloysius Gonzaga