Archives for July 2006

“The birds are the opposite of time. They represent our longing for light, for stars, for rainbows, and for jubilant song.”

Olivier Messiaen, program note for Quartet for the End of Time

It was hot in Manhattan on Monday, but not as hot as it was in St. George, Utah, last Friday. The bank thermometer read 110 degrees when I left the airport in my rental car. Fortunately, Cedar City, my destination, was considerably higher and somewhat cooler, and I got through my weekend at the Utah Shakespearean Festival in one piece. It helped that I ran into a long-lost friend with whom I had an unexpected and gratifying reunion, and I also profited from the advice contained in an e-mail from a fellow blogger:

If you have a free afternoon in Cedar City, take the 45-minute drive to Cedar Breaks National Monument. It’s sort of like Bryce Canyon, only more colorful and without big crowds. Visitor facilities are so rustic you’ll swear you’ve stepped into the 1930s. If you do decide to make that trip, don’t forget that you’ll be very high up (over 10,000 feet), where the air is thin and water–including the water in your radiator–boils quickly.

I took him up on it, and spent a considerable chunk of Saturday morning gawking at the view. As always, the trouble with scenery is tourists, and I felt sorely tempted to give a good hard push to a couple of noisy women at the Chessmen Ridge Overlook. Fortunately, the altitude silenced most of the other people I ran into (it really does make your head spin), who appeared to respond to the beauties of Cedar Breaks in much the same way as the raven-haired ranger to whom I paid my four-dollar toll. I told her I’d never seen anything like it, and she grinned at me and replied, “Oh, I’m in love with it. I have been ever since the first time I came here.”

I was tickled by two signs I saw along the way:

WARNING EXPOSED CLIFF EDGES AND NEARBY LIGHTNING ARE HAZARDOUS

OPEN RANGE WATCH FOR LIVESTOCK

Sunday was…well, long. I arose at 4:30, drove back to the St. George airport just ahead of the sunrise, flew from there to Los Angeles, sat around the terminal for a couple of hours, flew from there to Newark, and was driven from there to the Upper West Side of Manhattan. As I expected, it took me about thirteen hours to get from point A to point E, but I made reasonably good use of my time, writing part of my Wall Street Journal drama column in an LAX snack bar and reading most of Gail Levin’s Edward Hopper: An Intimate Biography on the plane. (I’d read it years ago, but I know a lot more about art now.)

Now I’m back home again, writing my “Sightings” column for Saturday’s Journal and preparing to receive a houseguest, my niece Lauren from Smalltown, U.S.A., who arrives in New York for a visit later this afternoon. We’re going to ascend the Empire State Building, ride the Circle Line, and go see Pilobolus, the Metropolitan Museum, and whatever Broadway musical I can get us into on the cheap by paying a sweaty visit to the TKTS booth in Times Square, which will be a first for me. I expect I’ll be blogging about Lauren’s visit from time to time, but should you not hear from me as frequently as usual, it means I’m out showing her the town.

More as it happens.

I wrote about Mickey Spillane in National Review three years ago, on the occasion of the paperback reissue of six of his out-of-print mysteries:

You remember Mickey Spillane, right? No? Not to worry–it’s an age thing. If you were born before 1960, his name will definitely ring a bell. He wrote six of the biggest-selling detective novels of the 20th century, and Mike Hammer, their tough-guy hero, was for a time all but synonymous with the genre. They spawned two TV series and several movies of widely varying quality, among them Robert Aldrich’s Kiss Me, Deadly (1955), now regarded as a film-noir classic, and The Girl Hunters (1963), a curiosity in which Spillane himself played Hammer (ineptly, alas, though it’s a wonderfully wacky idea–try to imagine Dashiell Hammett swapping wisecracks with Mary Astor in The Maltese Falcon). In addition, the “Girl Hunt” ballet in The Band Wagon is a Spillane send-up, with Fred Astaire as Hammer and Cyd Charisse as the leggy lady of mystery. That’s fame.

Back then, Spillane was considered the lowest of lowbrows, though he had his unlikely admirers, among them Kingsley Amis, who thought he was a better writer than Hammett or Raymond Chandler, and Ayn Rand, who said he was her favorite novelist since Victor Hugo. (I’m not making this up–it’s in her 1964 Playboy interview.) But most people who wrote about mysteries placed him several degrees beneath contempt. Chandler, not at all surprisingly, loathed Spillane, claiming that “pulp writing at its worst was never as bad as this.”…

And now? Well, it’s not quite right to say Spillane is forgotten, but the truth is even worse: he’s out of print. Though he continues to grind out an occasional novel, the early Hammer books, which between them sold some 130 million copies, have long been unavailable, even in paperback. At a time when American intellectuals are obsessed to the point of mania with pop culture, the most popular mystery writer of the postwar era has become an unperson, in spite of the fact that he is alive, well, and available for interviews….

The Mike Hammer series, launched in 1947 with I, the Jury, appears at first glance to share many of the major themes and preoccupations of postwar noir. Like countless other noir anti-heroes, Hammer is a World War II vet who comes home to find that the city of his youth (New York, not Los Angeles) has become a dangerous place, crime-ridden and profoundly corrupt. He, too, has changed, for the experience of combat has aroused in him a dark love of violence, which he uses in an attempt to restore order to the chaotic world around him: “I had gotten a taste of death and found it palatable to the extent that I could never again eat the fruits of a normal civilization….I was evil. I was evil for the good.”

Most noir characters are vigilantes of one sort or another–they have to be, since they are functioning in a radically corrupt society–so what was it that put this one beyond the pale? Part of the problem was Spillane’s blunt, inelegant prose style, which is unfailingly effective but in no obvious way “literary,” just as his frame of reference is deliberately, even aggressively anti-intellectual. Whereas Philip Marlowe drank gimlets and read Hemingway (or at least made well-informed fun of him in Farewell, My Lovely), Mike Hammer drinks beer and doesn’t read anything at all. He is a regular guy who happens to pack a rod….

Spillane was writing for a generation of fellow veterans who spent their off-duty hours thumbing through paperbacks–thrillers, westerns, even the odd classic. They were accustomed to taking pleasure in the printed word. Now their grandsons go to the movies, or watch TV. Novels, even mysteries, are overwhelmingly read by and written for women. This is not to say that nobody’s writing regular-guy books anymore: they’re just not being read by regular guys. A no-nonsense crime novelist like Elmore Leonard is far more likely to appeal to eggheads like me than the working stiffs about whom he writes–I’ve never seen anybody reading a Leonard novel on the subway–whereas Spillane’s books were actually read and enjoyed by men who weren’t all that different from Mike Hammer. He may well have been the last novelist of whom such a thing could be said….

Spillane died yesterday at the age of eighty-eight. If you’re curious, these were his three best books.

To read his New York Times obituary, go here.

I’m back in New York after a thirteen-hour trip from Utah. No, I am not ready to start blogging yet. I’ll see you after I (A) unpack and (B) get some sleep.

Later.

“It seems to me that music, generally speaking, is the proper language for philosophy.”

Aleksander Wat, My Century (courtesy of Anecdotal Evidence)

This week my entire Wall Street Journal drama column is devoted to DruidSynge:

In Ireland John Millington Synge is considered a great playwright. In America, however, he has vanished into the pantheon of half-remembered masters–none of his plays has been seen on Broadway since 1971–and even the Irish long preferred respecting him to performing him. It wasn’t until the Druid Theatre Company of Galway City started reviving his work in the ’70s that the author of “The Playboy of the Western World,” who died in 1909, once again became a hot ticket in the land of his birth.

Now Americans are getting a fresh chance to grapple with Synge. “DruidSynge,” a marathon presentation of his six major plays, just opened at the Lincoln Center Festival after a week-long run at Minneapolis’ Guthrie Theater. The plays, which run for a total of eight and a half hours (including a 90-minute dinner break), are staged by Garry Hynes, founder of the Druid Theatre Company and the first woman director to win a Tony Award. All six are performed on a powerfully evocative set designed by Francis O’Connor, a fog-filled, dirt-floored hut whose dead gray walls stretch upward to infinity. The results are a mixed bag, but the best parts are so good that you’ll forget the rest well before the long day closes….

No link. You know what to do: be cheap and buy today’s Journal, or be smart and subscribe to the online edition by going here.

“‘I hate music.’ His voice rises, and for the first time this evening he speaks with a hoarse intensity. ‘I hate this incomprehensible, melodious language which select people can understand and use to say uninhibited, irregular things that are also probably indecent and immoral. Watch their faces and see how strangely they change when they’re listening to music. You and Krisztina never sought out music–I do not remember you ever playing four-handed together, you never sat down at the piano in front of Krisztina, at least not in my presence. Evidently her sense of tact and shame restrained her from listening to music with you while I was there. And because music’s power is inexpressible, it seems to carry a larger danger in that it has the power to arouse the deepest emotions in people who come together to listen to it and discover that it is their fate to belong to each other.'”

S

Last week a friend took me to see Prairie Home Companion on a free pass. I went somewhat against my better judgment. Like anyone, I’m a fan of Robert Altman at his best. And like many, I’m a Garrison Keillor detractor. At the time we made the plan, I knew Keillor had written the script but wasn’t clear about whether I’d actually have to look at him. My friend, who as far as I can tell is neutral on the subject of Keillor but does hail from Lake Wobegon country, confirmed that Mr. Lawsuit would appear onscreen. “Oh well,” I wrote back, “we can bring tomatoes.” In the blink of an eye he responded: “I don’t throw tomatoes at Minnesotans.” A principled position that I had to respect, though I’m not at all sure there aren’t several Michiganders I would gladly pelt, given the opportunity, with whatever happened to be handy.

At the outset, I disliked the movie. Michael Blowhard has written with infectious enthusiasm about its meandering charm:

Weak on storyline and action, it’s nonetheless focused and controlled — more a “Tempest”-like poetic picture of life than a narrative: We live among spirits and archetypes; death and beauty are never more than a few steps away; gallantry, generosity, humor, and belief carry us through … It’s a jewelbox and a metaphysical romance, yet it’s fully inhabited and embodied, and it never stops rolling along.

This gets at the trademark naturalism of many Altman films, but in the early going of Prairie Home Companion that signal quality struck me as terribly staged. The scene backstage at the radio show (a fictional, small-time version of “Prairie Home Companion”) as on-air time approaches is barely controlled chaos, a classic Altman occasion. As in more persuasive such scenes in Altman’s oeuvre, we get overlapping conversations, a dozen subplots unfolding at once, and lots and lots to look at. In the midst of this cheerful frenzy, both the cheer and disorder seem centered on the singing sisters played by Lily Tomlin and Meryl Streep, who clatter in like a squall at the last minute. Sweet and tart, blithe and barely holding things together, they more than any other characters encapsulate the reigning mood and aesthetic of the radio show and of the movie itself. What a drag, then, when they start uttering gobs of exposition while doing their makeup. The genius of Altman’s naturalism, when it’s on, is that it doesn’t press explanations on you but lets you put things together gradually: who people are, what their relationships are to one another, what stories they trail behind him. When Tomlin and Streep launched on this character-establishing and backstory-telling torrent almost as soon as we’d met them, my heart sank. I thought the movie was going to be really bad–and guessed the culprit would be the script. I reached for my tomato. But I hadn’t brought one.

Good thing too, because the film eventually won me over–for the most part. The on-stage musical performances loosened things up considerably: they themselves are pure pleasure, and by virtue of the balance they provide, they make the more contrived backstage action more interesting. But even as the film grew lovelier and more absorbing, the mote that I kept wanting to flick away was the weirdly flat performance by Virginia Madsen as an angel of death or something. I shouldn’t blame Madsen; it was probably an unsalvageable role, though it is true that Kevin Kline spun another undercooked part into a little bit of incidental charm, at least, as Guy Noir.

Now to help me understand why Madsen’s angel was so objectionable, along comes Odienator at the group film and television blog The House Next Door with a great essay on angels of death in Prairie Home Companion and Bob Fosse’s All that Jazz. To his mind, Altman is soft-pedaling death, he’s not buying it, and it makes him miss the Altman of years past:

Later in the film, Dangerous Ginny comments that “the death of an old man is not a tragedy,” which led me to holler out, “Bullshit, Mr. Altman.” When Lola asks if he is concerned that this is the last show, G.K. says “every show is your last show. That’s my philosophy.” “Thank you, Plato,” Lola’s sister Yolanda (Lily Tomlin) sarcastically replies, saving grumps like me the trouble of talking back to the screen again.

…I am closer to 52 than 80, and more attuned to Broadway than Lake Woebegone; I know more about sex and self-destruction than the wisdom of age and the sense of entitlement one feels for living a long life. Most importantly, though, I also know something about being a grouch, and from that vantage point, Prairie‘s subtle exhortations to go gentle into that good night seem a false comfort from Altman to his fans–a reassurance that displaces his usual blunt honesty. For a movie whose cast includes a sexy reaper, Prairie is too smug and passive about dying. The mortal coil is unraveling from the show and its participants, yet Altman chooses to deflect a universal fear by pretending that death is a mere nuisance.

This is why Madsen is so terrible; her air-headed angel’s platitudes ring hollow in the Altman universe we’ve come to know. Would the younger Altman have let a character get away with such bullshit? This artist has never felt the need to embrace and console his audiences in the past, so why start now? Nashville‘s final number, “It Don’t Worry Me,” was about willful denial; the whole of Prairie is about acceptance, yet it feels like a denial as well. The palpable fear that this is Altman’s last movie is never honestly dealt with by the director’s stand-in, Keillor, nor the film itself. It seems almost as if Prairie thinks it holds the monopoly on dying, and that the show-within-a-movie is noble–and its demise a tragedy–simply because it’s been around for so long. Altman’s onscreen representative G.K. keeps pooh-poohing the distress his colleagues feel throughout their last show, going so far as to state that he doesn’t want to tell people how to feel about his legacy; but his relaxed attitude never feels true. Altman throws out a hopeful, interesting curve when dealing with the fate of Tommy Lee Jones’ character (a fantasy of how to deal with one’s enemies). Here is the mean Altman we know and love, lashing out at his critics, informing you of his perceived greatness and how much it’ll be missed once he’s gone. But the film treats it as a throwaway; as quickly as it arrives, it defers back to that transparent, dishonest lulling. If Prairie weren’t so concerned with coddling us, we’d deduce that it’s OK to acknowledge Death–just don’t go looking for it; wait until it shows up to pull your number.

Yes. Read the whole thing, and bookmark that blog because they are always posting something good.

Incidentally, my first ten Altman films, in (rough) order of preference: The Long Goodbye, McCabe and Mrs. Miller, California Split, MASH, Short Cuts, Gosford Park, Cookie’s Fortune, The Player, Thieves Like Us, The Gingerbread Man. I’ve only seen half of Nashville, sad to say, and half a movie never sticks.