The National Performing Arts Convention
June 11-14, 2008 saw the first true National Performing Arts Convention, a gathering of service
organizations in
This convention was very different. While the different
service organizations did have some sessions reserved for their own membership,
the bulk of the content was jointly conceived and produced, and was all woven
together by a series of caucuses organized by America Speaks, a remarkable
organization that produces town meetings fostering communication and discussion
in rooms filled with hundreds of people--and, in the finale, a room filled with about
1,200 people.
The core producers of this event were Chorus
There were many stimulating discussions and sessions, and I'm
certain that the highlights will be publicized elsewhere; they merit a fuller
exposition than is possible or desirable in this space. What I want to comment
on here is simply how gratifying it was to see administrators, trustees,
volunteers, and patrons from a huge variety of art forms and a huge range of
organizational sizes--not to mention the 700 artists who attended this
convention--come together and talk to each other, in many cases for the first
time.
The America Speaks process, which forces people of diverse
backgrounds and experiences together around small tables--each facilitated to
assure that everyone does speak (and listen)--asked us all to explore what we
thought were the challenges/opportunities facing the performing arts in
America, and what might be strategies for making progress on those issues on
the national and local levels, and across organizations as well as within
individual organizations.
These conversations were not meant to be a complete process,
but rather the beginning of
approaches that the arts community might take in elevating the position of the
arts in our society. Some of the recommendations that came out of NPAC can be
briefly summarized as relating to Value, Advocacy, Education, and Diversity. Topics
debated and voted on under the Value and Advocacy headings ranged from creating
a seat for culture in the cabinet to forging partnerships with other sectors to
identify how the arts can serve community needs. Under Education, issues
involved education reform and rescinding the No Child Left Behind act,
innovative financial models to fund the arts (link to the tax base, dedicated
sales tax etc.), and directly engaging teachers to integrate the arts into
their teaching and professional-development programs. Finally, under Diversity
it was acknowledged that there is still much to be done, and that national
service organizations and others should be charged with stimulating dialogue at
their meetings, creating internships and entry-level staff positions, and setting
long-term goals to have staff, board, programming, and audiences reflect the
demographics of the community. The goal is to have heads of service
organizations take up these points--and many others that came up in the rich
tapestry of discussions throughout the four days of NPAC--and to fashion a
suggested plan of action.
Obviously, I am no better able than anyone else to predict
the outcome of these efforts. But what I can observe, and what seems worth
observing here, is the remarkable result of the planning of this convention. NPAC
2008 was the first time that a very diverse group of leaders from the full
range of the performing arts worked together to this degree of depth and complexity--and
the result is something that all can be proud of. The co-chairs of the
convention,
1 Comments