League of American Orchestras 2008 Conference Address
As I completed my
tenure as president and CEO of the League of American Orchestras, I felt it
appropriate to share with the delegates to our annual conference in
I am going to ask you to indulge me for a few minutes today,
as I share with you some observations made after 45 years in our world of music,
including some 30 years of involvement with the League. The past seven of those
years, as the League's chair and then president, have in many ways been the most
satisfying, because they've provided for me the national perspective that you
cannot get at one orchestra. You cannot understand the vitality of the
orchestral scene in
Many of us feel that the arts have been increasingly marginalized
in this country--a sure indication of a decaying society. Any careful examination
of newspapers across
Government funding, in real dollars, has declined at all levels in the past quarter century.
And then there's our education system, which for the past 25
or 30 years in so many of our cities has been reducing or eliminating music and
the arts.
Some of you have heard me say before that we as a field are
not without guilt in creating the gulf that exists between orchestral music and
major segments of our population. We have over the years allowed a rather
precious, ritual-like atmosphere to accrue around our particular art form--in
the way we present it and the way we talk and write about it--an atmosphere
guaranteed to put some distance between the art and the people. If those who
wrote about music wrote with the same passion, personal involvement, and communicative
power that we find on the sports pages, we would be in a very different place.
But there are genuine societal issues at play as well. I see
a growing climate of anti-intellectualism in
Many in positions of authority, those who shape education
budgets and public agendas, seem to like simple answers: quantifiable,
measurable, testable indications of progress. It is easier for them to talk and
think in sound bites. So when we talk about the non-quantifiable, human
qualities of music and the arts, when we start talking about the way in which
an understanding of great art leads to a greater understanding of other
cultures and peoples, to shaping a complete, creative, and productive human
being more capable of bridging differences, we are asked to document it,
perhaps on a graph. Well...I can't do that-- but every year of my life spent in
music makes me more certain of it. You-- every one of you in this room today-- know
it too. If I am pushed to "prove it," I might use as an example Daniel
Barenboim's West-Eastern Divan Orchestra, made up of young musicians who are
Palestinians, Arabs, and Israeli Jews--sitting together onstage, making music
together instead of shooting at each other. Or
We have historically been the field in the arts most resistant to change. While museums were adding audio guides, interactive exhibits, and imaginative new ways of bringing their art to their public, while opera companies were not only adding supertitles but utilizing advances in lighting and stage technology to keep their art form alive, many orchestras were continuing to present concerts that would look and feel pretty much the way concerts looked and felt to Brahms. But today I am seeing fresh, imaginative thinking everywhere in our field.
No orchestra can behave as if its mission statement were:
"to perform, at the highest level possible, great music written for Western
symphony orchestra, for those people who already like it and can afford its
ticket prices." Those who shape our orchestras know this. The result is that
today the field is innovating and experimenting in so many directions it can
make your head spin. It is happening in cities and towns large and small, many
of them places the national press rarely visits.
When I sit down with orchestra boards and staffs, more and
more what they want to talk
about is civic engagement. If you go back ten or twenty
years, when orchestras produced community programs, the aim of those programs
was often to try to create ticket buyers. That has changed dramatically, and
I'd like to think that the League has had something to do with encouraging and
supporting that change. The League's new resource, On the Road to Authentic Civic Engagement: An Assessment Resource for
Orchestras in Their Communities, is a direct response to a growing demand
for tools to help in this area. More and more, orchestras are seeking ways to
be true resources to all parts of their communities without regard to whether
the people served ever turn into subscribers.
There is no question that giving full symphonic concerts in
our concert halls is and always will be at the core of our mission. But its
place at the center still leaves room for a broad and diverse range of
activities that link us to our communities. That is vital to our future, and it
is happening everywhere. Orchestras must be judged by all of their work--on and off the stage--and not solely by their main-series
subscription concerts.
Orchestras are also thinking about concert presentation. Shouldn't
the form of a symphony concert have evolved since Mendelssohn's day? Twenty-five
years ago most conductors would not dare speak to audiences. Now, many of them
do. You may think that is a trivial matter. I do not. The formalistic ritual of
the symphony concert, almost mystical in its trappings, bears very little
relationship to 21st-century
In marketing and development, in patron service, in
governance, in internal relationships, in re-thinking revenue models, in every
single aspect of orchestra administration today there is a wonderful sense of
questioning, of asking whether the way we did things 50 years ago is right for
now. We are making real, if sometimes slow, progress on our internal
relationships. The days in which musicians and managements were adversaries are
slowly receding, and they must disappear.
We are all in this together, and we better be unified.
Orchestras are trying experiments of varying kinds to reach
the generations of young and middle-aged folks today who grew up re-wired by
constant exposure to television, not to mention the Internet. Just how we
recognize and deal with that is still a question, but it is a question being
addressed. We must establish a culture in which orchestras are encouraged to
experiment with concert formats, including visual elements, and be allowed to
fail in some of those experiments. We should not underestimate the receptivity
of young people to the music itself--even if we have to re-examine many aspects
of the delivery system through which they experience it. Look at the health of
our youth orchestras--I believe we have every reason to be optimistic about a
future full of passionate musicians and listeners.
And if I may be allowed a parting rant about one of my hobby
horses, it is crucial that more orchestras bring the element of fun back into the concert hall more
frequently. I wrote some years ago in Symphony
magazine about the disappearance of light classics from our main concert
series--works like Suppé overtures or Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsodies--works that have for the past 40 or 50 years
been largely relegated to "pops" concerts. I have news for conductors who won't
play these works because they "belong on pops concerts." When they were
written, there were no pops concerts.
I accept that symphonic music can and must explore the full range and depth of
human emotion, including grief and tragedy. But charm, wit, and humor are also
parts of the human character, and they belong in our concert halls too. Fun at
a "serious" concert is okay, folks.
Continuing the process of thinking about all of the issues
confronting symphony orchestras is the challenge that we all face, and a
challenge that the League is more firmly and passionately dedicated to than
ever. As I leave the presidency, and turn it over to the remarkably capable and
imaginative
For whatever it is worth, I remain optimistic about the
health of orchestras in the future. Are there issues to be faced? Certainly.
Are those who run orchestras meeting those challenges, and demonstrating
imagination as they adapt to a changing environment? Absolutely. There is no
question in my mind about that. This art form has a broad appeal and deep
meaning to human beings of wildly different cultural, social, and economic
backgrounds--that is because it communicates to us things that cannot be
communicated in words. The strength of our orchestras is, in fact, the strength
of the music they play.
As we go forward helping to shape the future of this art
and, therefore, this society, let us all work to make certain that America
takes the lead in making the future something more than faster computers,
bigger buildings, more productive factories, greater profits--and certainly
about something other than more devastating wars and conflicts. The peak of
human achievement, in civilization after civilization, is represented by its
artistic and cultural achievements. The great playwright Arthur Miller may well
have put it best: "When the cannons have
stopped firing, and the great victories of finance are reduced to surmise and
are long forgotten, it is the art of the people that will confront future
generations. The arts can do more to sustain the peace than all the wars, the
armaments, and the threats and warnings of the politicians." Thank you.