THEATRE
NEEDS TO CHANGE:
A London conference on the state of theatre heard a lot of bad
news last week. The consensus: theatre is an artform in trouble.
"Theatre thinks 'we're very worthy, we earn about no money,
so sit on bad seats because we're poverty-stricken and we will
tip you out into the cold night without a drink at the end.' The
cinema learnt its lessons. Theatre hasn't adjusted itself to the
lifestyles of the people it wants to come in." The Independent (London) 03/03/01
STATE
OF THE ART(OF WRITING ABOUT IT): America's theatre critics
gather in New York to talk about the state of their art: Too many
critics write snap judgments, critics shouldn't be writing plays
or acting in communities in which they write, and the jury's still
out on theatre coverage on the internet. Philadelphia Inquirer 03/04/01
ONE
WAY TO CUT LOSSES: Sending immediate shockwaves through Britain’s
theatre world, acclaimed director Richard Eyre told a conference
investigating why UK theatre audiences were falling that the nation’
subsidized theatres (including the Royal Shakespeare Company and
National Theatre) should be disbanded, rather than continue churning
out stale work. "We have to acknowledge that theatre companies
have a finite life span and that few manage to sustain artistic
ardour beyond seven years."
The Telegraph (London) 3/02/01
PUTTING
PEOPLE OFF: Theater-ticket sales are declining in London’s
West End, amid cries of an impending "crisis point"
due to traffic congestion, poor public transportation, and escalating
street crime. BBC 2/28/01
END
OF ACTING? Is the actor an endangered species? "I think
the first big leading indicator was baby boomers' abandonment
of live theater. This is an overstatement, a gross generalization,
but it's also true: for cosmopolitan people of my parents' generation,
experiencing live actors on stage was an obligation—a kind of
secular humanist sacrament in a way that it simply isn't for people
who came of age in the 1960s and 70s. Younger people tend to find
live theater too intimate, too unmediated, too real, too creepy."
PublicArts 02/18/01
LIFE
AND DEATH THEATRE: "Theatre has shot itself in the foot
by giving in to this cult of success, status and glamour. Theatre
has been taken down this glitzy route that has destroyed its validity
and truth. Will there be any theatre in 10 or 20 years' time?
Every other art and entertainment medium is engaged in a life-and-death
struggle with new technology and the multiplying distractions
of contemporary life. Theatre, meanwhile, is examining its collective
navel." Sunday
Times (London) 02/04/01
MAKING THEATRE
BETTER: "Should we ban all new Australian works from
our stages for five years with the note, 'Write better'? Clearly,
most plays being written at any time, anywhere, are third-rate
literature. Even a good play rarely bears comparison with the
wit and complexity of a fine book of essays, the complexity and
mystery of a great novel, the mystery and beauty of a great poem.
But a play script isn't literature; it's one limb of that deeply
complex, mysterious and volatile organism called theatre. Promising
playwrights won't become good playwrights by being kept at arm's
length from the activity of theatre-making."
Sydney Morning Herald
01/23/01
DEATH
OF AN ART? Cabaret as an artform is 100 years old. But will
it survive much longer? "Admittedly, we've been hearing about
the death of cabaret for years. And many young comedians who once
considered themselves the heirs to this form of entertainment
are now over the hill. Nevertheless, the developments of recent
years are hard to ignore. Almost all the major ensembles have
either disbanded or lost their relevance."
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 01/24/01
BROKEN PROMISES? Britain’s regional theatres were
thrilled when the government announced an extra £25 million to
rescue the country’s ailing playhouses. But now suspicions are
running high over exactly how the money (due to be allocated in
2003) will be spent. "The main cause of disagreement is simple.
The 50 building-based English theatres that produce their own
work feel betrayed. They believe that the entire £25 million increase
should have been passed directly on to them, and are alarmed that
the Arts Council is apparently keeping back nearly a third of
the money for other projects." The Times (London) 1/16/01
NEW ISN'T BETTER: Lottery money has led
to massive building of theatres in Britain. But "theatre
isn't about bricks and mortar - or, these, days, concrete and
glass. It's about what happens on that stage inside. It's about
imagination, about content and about ideas. The heresy that a
new building was more important than a new idea began about a
generation ago. The glamorous, if sometimes tacky, Edwardian music
halls were pulled down. Lottery money made this obsession with
rebuilding even worse." London Evening Standard 12/29/00
THE ART OF CHANGE: "Theatre is rapidly
changing, and audiences shun routine and crave something special.
It may take the form of a day-long event - the shared experience
of watching together from morning to night forges a sense of community.
But the profusion of short plays also implies that audiences are
happy to have a short, sharp theatrical shock, an intense experience
as a prelude to dinner. To reverse Brecht's dictum, first come
the morals, then the bread." The Guardian (London) 12/27/00
IS OUR THEATRE OKAY? Should a critic express
grave concern over the state of Canadian theatre when the poorly
funded non-profits embrace facile populism and the commercial
sector shrinks to a shadow of its former self? Or do all those
dynamic little shows popping up here and there indicate irrepressible
creativity and renewed health?" The Globe & Mail (Canada) 12/25/00
WHAT WILL MUSICAL
THEATRE LOOK LIKE? "We've come to the end of the road
for one style of musical, the giant pseudo-Romantic pop-rock sludge
pile. I never liked these things; now nobody likes them. As far
as I'm concerned, Cats (closed) and Miss Saigon (expiring next
month) have been flops all along—the public simply didn't take
my reviews to heart until now." But what comes next? Village Voice 12/20/00
CULTIVATING
THE NEXT GENERATION, NO DOUBT: A mother calls up a radio program
in Sydney to complain about having to pay $27 for a ticket for
her in-arms baby when she went to "Annie." The producer
responds: "We are not a charity. The company could have $45
or $50 for the baby." And the radio station's switchboard
lights up and patrons call the theatre to cancel their tickets.
Sydney Morning Herald
12/18/00
ACTORS IN POVERTY: The Equity actors' union
takes a poll of 408 of its members and finds that the majority
of actors (72 percent) earn less than £10,000 a year from their
profession. "Performers felt they were seen either as glamorous,
arrogant, overpaid slackers or laughable luvvies and that acting
is not a proper job". BBC 12/13/00
THEATRE THREAT: Melbourne's commercial
theatre owners are complaining - about the cost of producing,
about "subsidised operations at the Arts Centre, gaming-supported
shows at Crown casino and the looming distractions of the $400
million Federation Square." The Age (Melbourne) 12/11/00
THE ALLURE OF LIVE: Regular theatergoers
take it for granted that there's nothing like a live performance
- which, I think, is why the theater is perennially in trouble.
The uniqueness should not be taken for granted. Boston Globe 12/10/00
MORE THAN LIVE: "We all know that
what makes theater irreplaceable (and, on dream nights, irresistible)
is that it combines live performance and fakery in ways no other
form of art or entertainment can match. Call it the unities of
the primal, the artificial and the mythic." New York Times 12/10/00 (one-time registration
required for access)
ALL ABOUT THE BUILDINGS: "Truth being
stranger than cliché, the very notion of re-inventing theatre
spaces - or, to borrow estate agent terminology, location, location,
location - is spreading through theatre like wildfire for the
simple reason that the biggest problem facing the allegedly dying
art form is the buildings themselves." The Observer (London) 12/10/00
PROFIT?
NONPROFIT?: Manhattan Theatre Club is the latest nonprofit producer
to venture into Broadway’s commercial turf, with plans to transfer
three shows and a takeover of a commercial house in the works.
"The debate over what is the proper province of the nonprofit
theater vs. the commercial theater long ago was drowned out by
the irresistible din of the Broadway box office. It may have been
a shotgun wedding between dysfunctional families, but the marriage
is a keeper." New York Magazine 12/11/00
REGIONAL THEATER BOOM: Taking advantage of the strong economy and unprecedented
production support from commercial producers, regional theaters
are booming across the country, presenting ever more adventurous
work and strengthening ties with local audiences. "The point
is that the American theater gospel is no longer being spread
papally from New York. It has its own independent denominations."
New York Times 12/05/00 (one-time
registration required for access)
THEATRE IN
AUSTRALIA: "In the 1970s and early 1980s Australian theatre
was seen as part of an integral social debate about national identity
and self confidence. The advent of serious arts funding came out
of clearly articulated statements on the importance of the arts,
and our politicians were well versed in the reasons why a funded
arts environment was important to a social system. The arts were
seen as a necessary expense, like roads or water." Now we
should enjoy the rewards. Sydney
Morning Herald 11/29/00
A
HISTORY OF THE THEATRE: Theatre is a vanishing art - that
is, once produced on a stage it recedes into memory, and even
a film of a performance can't truly capture its essence. So how
do you produce a TV history of the theatre? "Sir Richard
Eyre, doyen of British theatre, has produced a history of 20th-century
stagecraft. He says it won't please everyone. The Independent (London)
11/07/00
THE TROUBLE WITH THEATRE IN PORTLAND: "Why
have so many small and midsize Portland theaters gone belly-up
in recent years? Why don't the city's hip trendsetters have the
kind of yen for drama that keeps the Seattle theater scene hopping,
from our spiffy professional houses to our fringe cubbyholes?"
Seattle Times 10/27/00
WHAT THEATER IS NOT: "Entertaining," "instructional,"
"celebratory," or "cathartic," at least in
the opinion of one riled performing arts professor. The solution?
"We should refuse to sit and watch the same old masquerade,
the same old plays, the same old actors. We need to kill the theatre
off so that new performance can have room to grow." The Guardian (London)
10/04/00
LEADING BLACK THEATRE CLOSES: New
Jersey's Crossroads Theatre Company has closed down. The Tony
Award-winning company, one of the nation's most prominent black
theaters, announced its decision Monday. "The bottom line
is that we are in great debt - $1.7 million to $2 million in debt."
Philadelphia Inquirer (AP) 10/04/00
RUMORS
OF ITS DEATH… Even before the British Arts Council promised
£37 million in additional funding, there were plenty of signs
that regional theater is already thriving. Audiences are growing,
communities are showing support, and theaters are discovering
that their power is in numbers. “If one regional theatre thrives,
so will others. If one closes, it threatens others. If you've
got leprosy and your hand drops off, it doesn't benefit the rest
of the body. It's still dying.” The Guardian (London) 09/27/00
TOO
LITTLE, TOO LATE? After two decades of underfunding, Britain’s
regional theatres were promised a £37 million rescue package from
the Arts Council of England (to be paid out between 2002 and ’04).
But “there is a general acceptance that regional theatre must
reinvent itself. [It’s] at a crossroads, a crossroads littered
with signs pointing in different directions.” The Telegraph (London) 09/19/00
IS THEATRE DYING? "What
we are seeing these days is, more precisely, the theatrical version
of the hostile takeover. 'Englut and devour' - the name that Mel
Brooks once invented for a Hollywood studio - is becoming the
motto of the American stage. The triumph of American commercialism
is hardly a novelty of the millennium. What is different today
is the lack of any indignation about it. It seems almost quixotic
these days to criticize the relationship between art and commerce,
and a little nostalgic even to try to evoke any interest in the
question." The
New Republic 09/08/00
STOMACHING GOOD THEATRE
"Theaters talk a great deal about how they want to keep their
patrons happy, how they want to attract younger audiences and
how they want to stir discussion. But too often they ignore the
obvious fact that along with first-rate fare on the stage, a good
cup of coffee, a calming glass of wine, some simple but appealing
food and a few cafe tables might do the trick, making the theatergoing
experience something more than a park-the car, sit-through-the
play, run-for-the-garage kind of night." Chicago Sun-Times 09/03/00
BROADWAY
BOOMING: Broadway theatre ticket sales were up a phenomenal
21 percent this summer over the same period last year, leading
to hopes for a strong fall as the new season opens.
Variety 09/01/00
GET WITH THE
PROGRAM: You may take for granted that thin, glossy free
program the smiling ushers
hand out to you as you enter the theatre, but you should keep
in mind not all arts-goers in the world are as fortunate as you:
Says one deprived Australian, "Why can't our theatres offer
free, or at least cheap, information? Why do we pay six, 12, even
15 dollars for what should be a basic audience service?"
Sydney Morning Herald 08/31/00
HOW'RE
WE DOING? "The current state of play in the theatre is
actually decidedly encouraging on many fronts. I would hazard
a guess that the recent drive towards cheap TV programming and
its dumbing down have driven ranks of citizens out of their living
rooms in search of better arts and entertainment in public venues.
I'm also not convinced the net is going to produce future generations
of stay-at-home IT and virtual-reality addicts." The Independent (London) 08/17/00
A DEFENSE:
"Who says the theater has reached a dead end? The current
London season is filled with confirmations of how protean the
discipline remains, as variable and potentially surprising as
human beings themselves. Local observers may lament the Americanization
of the London stage, with its adaptations of Hollywood movies
and reliance on brand-name celebrities. But if you look past pandering
hits like "The Graduate," you'll discover an abiding,
very British penchant for playing with plays, a delight in demonstrating
what theater can do that other forms cannot." New York Times 08/17/00 (one-time registration
required for entry)
IS
THE NET GOOD FOR THEATER? While many theater lovers bemoan
that Internet culture is eroding the audience for live performance,
one critic at least sees it differently. “The current state of
play is actually decidedly encouraging on many fronts. I would
hazard a guess that the recent drive towards cheap TV programming
and its dumbing down have driven ranks of citizens out of their
living rooms in search of better arts and entertainment in public
venues.” The Independent (London) 08/14/00
FEASTING
ON SUMMER THEATRE: Canada's summer theatres are booming. "The
Ontario festivals are tourism fat-cats who feast on private dollars.
During a decade when government funding of the arts has been steadily
shrinking, the festivals' incomes and expenditures have steadily
grown. Stratford is the largest performing-arts organization in
the country, and its $35-million budget has increased almost 50%
in the last five years. With smaller theatres and fewer seats
to fill, Shaw's growth has been less spectacular but is certainly
healthy."
Toronto Globe and Mail 07/28/00
RUSSIAN
REVITALIZATION: “With more than 100 theaters in Moscow alone
- and another 400 in the rest of the country - Russian theater
has survived, in large part because Russians refuse to let it
die. There were several times when Russian theater should have
fallen flat on its face, but it has survived every crisis with
flying colors.” Many deem director Kama Ginkas largely responsible
- as Moscow’s busiest and most successful director, he saw five
of his plays staged last season alone, each one in its own way
a hit. New York Times 07/25/00 (one-time registration required for entry)
MAKE IT FREE
AND THEY WILL COME: The British government proposes to make admission to museums free. But
what about theatre? "An entire generation has got out of
the theatre habit: education, prejudice and attention span are
all partly to blame, but the biggest barrier is expense. As an
incentive to people who don't like theatre because they've never
tried it, a proportion of seats should be free. There will always
be those who save hard to afford the outrageous prices, but unless
we make it easy and cheap for some of the others, those who grew
up on cheap and easy visits will be dead and there will be no
one to replace them." The Observer (London)
07/09/00
BOOM
TIMES FOR PHILLY THEATRE: Philadelphia has had another record
theatre season at the box office. A boom economy and popular plays
are given credit. Philadelphia Inquirer
07/09/00
HELP
FOR THE THEATRE? A group
of prominent British actors writes to England's Chancellor to
plead for help for the theatre. "We feel that for far too
long lack of adequate funding has led to a decline in working
opportunities, to fewer new productions and to smaller casts.
The extent of this decline is such that quality of productions
in our regional theatres is seriously threatened." The Independent 07/01/00
A
CRISIS IN BRITISH THEATRE: The chairman of the Arts Council
of England says there's a crisis in British theatre. "British theatre is living in the past and is failing to attract
young people," he says, and called on the government to pour
an extra £100 million into the arts to help solve some of the
problems. The Independent 06/28/00
PRODUCING A NEW
REALITY: Long gone are the days when a Broadway producer could
come up with a good idea and $50,000 and head into production.
The theatre world has changed - "from the large sums of money
needed to get a production off the ground to the corporate presence
in the theatre world to the role that advertising and marketing
play in promoting a show. The day of the independent producer
- nurturing a project from start to finish - is largely a thing
of the past." Backstage
06/22/00
LEARNING THE HARD WAY:
How can Broadway shows possibly satisfy the tastes of the crowds
lining up to see “Footloose” and “Saturday Night Fever” as well
as those looking for avant-garde productions and the many critics
sore that the Great White Way has “become just another aisle in
the great Disney store”? The Public Theater is learning the hard
way - its “Wild Party” just closed at a loss of more than $5 million
(just two years after its “On the Town” lost them $7 mil). “The
Public's multimillion losses might be admirable for an online
pet-food start-up, but not for a nonprofit organization with just
over 30 million dollars left in the bank. And all because a director
of extraordinary but erratic ability - George C. Wolfe, the man
responsible for Tony Kushner's “Angels in America” and “Bring
in da Noise, Bring in da Funk” - wanted to single-handedly reinvigorate
Broadway. What a dumb idea.” Feed 06/19/00
THE
CHANGING FACE OF THEATRE: "In
1974, the first gathering of commercial producers and leaders
from the nonprofit regional theater was, by many accounts, a prickly
session that featured name-calling, walk-outs and the feeling
that there was nothing remotely in common between those two disparate
sides of the American theater." Now, telling the difference
between the two is often problematic. Hartford Courant 06/18/00
REINVENTING
THEATRE: "If theatre began the 20th century as the dominant
art form and the major source of entertainment for most people,
it begins the 21st in a much less happy position. Some claim that
the new digital technologies will sound the death knell for theatre.
This seems as absurd as the idea
that the replacement of candlelight with gaslight would destroy
all the magic of the stage. After all, old technologies were once
new technologies. There was a time when the stage revolve was
considered a thing of wonder." The Guardian 06/14/00
BEYOND BROADWAY:
It’s been widely reported that this year’s Broadway season was
boffo box office, with record-breaking ticket sales and the second
highest attendance on record. Now the numbers are in from regional
theaters around the country, and they’re equally encouraging:
a combined box-office take of $1.2 billion and total attendance
of more than 23 million. Backstage
06/07/00
THE
FUTURE OF BROADWAY: A while
back, Stephen Sondheim complained to the New York Times' Frank
rich that too much of Broadway's recent fare is "recycled
culture," and lumped shows like "Lion King" in
with spectacles like "Cats." What's he want to go dissing
"Lion King's" Julie Taymor for? "He should be championing
her. Sondheim and Taymor are kindred spirits, erudite and verbal
to a degree that makes them outsiders in the context of Broadway."
New York Press 05/31/00
TOUGH
TIME TO TOUR: Who’s to blame for the sad state of Britain’s
touring theatre companies? “This is not a story of villainous
theatre managers unable to recognize a good thing when it is stuck
under their noses. It is the story of an often ignored, certainly
underfunded and distinctly unglamorous sector of theatre that
is in crisis.” The
Guardian 05/31/00
THE BIG APPLE'S
HOLLOW CORE: There was a time when all American theatre seemed
to flow from New York. Now, because of the economics, new work
- particularly new plays - almost never start in New York. "What
does manage to find its way there can be as odd and eccentrically
selected as an ill-sorted group of birds who get blown hundreds
of miles from their native habitats by a hurricane." Dallas Morning News 05/28/00
WHAT
IF THEY HAD A THEATRE BOOM AND NOBODY CAME? More theatre is produced in Los Angeles than in any city
in the US, including New York. But more often than not, the cast
outnumbers the audience in dozens of small 99-seat theaters spread
out throughout the metropolitan area. "Audience apathy can
partially be attributed to there being no theater center in Los
Angeles." Los Angeles Times 05/22/00
BROADWAY HAS RECORD
WEEK: Broadway set an attendance record during the week
of April 17-23, when some 308,000 people saw the 36 plays and
musicals currently playing Broadway houses. The League of American
Theaters and Producers says the number “challenges both Shea and
Yankee stadiums’ weekly in-season draws.” Gross receipts for the
week were reported at $17 million, an increase of more than 25
percent over last year’s figure of $13.4 million. Backstage 05/05/00
THEATRE UTILITY:
For most of us, watching live performers act and sing is an infrequent
luxury. Theater, like many of the other performing arts, long
ago broke with its proletarian roots and assumed the gilded mantle
of "culture." In an era of instant entertainment on
the TV and the Internet, attending a play or a musical has become
a special event, identified (unfairly, some might argue) with
formality, cultural literacy, seriousness and, above all, disposable
income. But theater, by its very nature, is about emotional outreach.
Orange County Register 04/23/00
A LUDDITE ART: "As theater artists ponder
the future of their form, they return again and again to the idea
of longing - and to language that seems to have more to do with
the bedroom than the stage. Technology, which promises to bring
drastic changes to the arts in terms of style and substance, will
affect theater, too, of course. But at root, theater is a Luddite
art, one that rests on the same equation as in the days of Sophocles:
The theatrical relationship between performer and audience, like
the relationship of lovers, depends on being in the same place
at the same time." St. Louis Post-Dispatch 04/17/00
THEATRE
GLUT? It's not like business is terrible - there are still
hits aplenty in London's West End theaters. It's just that many
of the theaters are having a hard time making a go of it. Are
there too many theaters to go around? The Observer 03/26/00
WELCOME
TO THE MIDDLE CLASS: In Los Angeles a new theater middle class
rises. There are a hundred theaters out there. But, like the city
itself, LA's "theater district" is spread out hither
and yon. "People from out of town look at a map of L.A.,
see all the theaters and can't believe it - they're all over the
place." Los Angeles
Times 03/05/00
ONE MORE FOR
THE ROAD: The commercial theater business has been booming.
But ominous signs are afoot. Some are proclaiming the end of the
mega-musicals, the engine that has been driving business on Broadway
and on the road. What's to replace the big musicals on the touring
circuit? Boston Globe 02/27/00
THEATRE
DICTATE: A study for the Arts Council of England finds that
traditional "text-based" drama is rapidly losing its
appeal to modern audiences. "A funding review of 50 theatres,
mainly in the provinces but including some noted London venues
outside the West End, has found an alarming decline in the popularity
of conventional plays. The review suggests that 'live theatre',
such as laser, acrobatic and video spectacles, have wider appeal
and should be embraced by theatres as a condition of receiving
public grants." London Telegraph 02/14/00
MISSING
THE MEGAS: As the era of the mega-musicals on Broadway wanes,
theatres around the country that count on the shows to fill their
seasons face difficult times. Hartford
Courant 02/13/00
THE
THEATRE PROBLEM? Stephen Sondheim goes to London and sounds
off about the current state of theater: "It's quite discouraging
to see that London is slowly becoming like Broadway," he
says. He bemoans the fact that Americans are drawn to productions
whose values are based less on the words and the music than the
length of the spectacle and the number of scenery changes. He
is most frightened by the lack of serious plays on Broadway. In
his opinion, audiences in London have broader tastes, attend more
regularly and treat the theatre as enjoyment rather than a chore.
The British hunger for challenging productions has helped to provide
opportunities for new talent, from the West End to the fringe.
London Sunday Times 02/13/00
CONSUMER
REPORTS: A new book finds British theater critics in a state
of disarray. Some blame editors for making their jobs harder.
Others report a dichotomy between older and younger critics. "The
older generation instinctively sees theatre as central to our
culture. Younger critics won't talk about theatre as a serious
art medium. They question it all the time." The Independent 02/02/00
LACK
OF BROADWAY DRAMAS has some in the theater business lamenting
the Disneyfication of Broadway and wondering if there's a crisis
in American theater. CBC
02/02/00
ON OUR
OWN: Two seasons ago, faced with a dwindling number of affordable
touring shows to book into their theaters, a couple of East Coast
theater presenters entered the business of producing on their
own. Nothing big budget, nothing flashy, but at least the shows
fit these 1,200-seat venues. Philadelphia Inquirer
01/24/00
BROADWAY
ON TOUR: Touring Broadway shows make more money than even
a record year on the Great White Way itself. But what are patrons
of the road shows really getting for their money? Some of these
shows are Broadway Lite. San Francisco Chronicle
01/23/00
IS MUSICAL THEATER
DEAD? And just why is everyone so eager to ask the question?
But maybe to ask it is to ensure its revitalization. Village Voice 01/04/00
NOTHING
TO LAUGH ABOUT: For the first time in memory there are no
recently written dramas or comedies playing on Broadway. What
does this say about the health of the city's theater biz? New York Times 12/28/99 (one-time registration required for entry)
ENDANGERED
SPECIES: New report says that regional theater in the UK is
in trouble. Access has been encouraged over quality with the result
that in a few years there could be "a crop of new lottery-funded
theatres with nothing to put in them because local authorities
cannot afford to run them." BBC 12/7/99