|
|
Blockbusteritis
|
|
|
ART
AS SHOW BIZ: "Artists
agree that they are no longer content to be recognized only by
their peers and a small circle of critics, curators, collectors
and dealers; rather, they want to participate in a larger cultural
arena. Looking at art is no longer a private elite event. It has
a huge public audience. After all, the Phillips Collection is
going to Las Vegas! The audience for modern art has multiplied,
and people like spectacle. Art has become part of popular entertainment."
The
New York Times 02/18/01 (one-time
registration required for access)
FEWER
PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY LOOKING:
Enormous crowds at Tate Modern and the Royal Academy’s "Apocalypse"
show have supposedly signaled a new level of public interest in
art - but have they? London attendance records actually show numbers
are down for many other solid, well-curated exhibits. "Could
the over-promotion of selective versions of contemporary art be
channelling the interest people have for it in ways from which it
will never escape, and creating a new category of sold experience
where only quality should count?"
The
Independent 1/09/01
WHAT
PRICE SUCCESS? John Walsh has been checking
out other museums since he stepped down as director of the Getty
in September. "I keep thinking, what price success? Museums
are drawing huge audiences, but to what? To dazzling new buildings
or renovated ones, very often, or to ballyhooed exhibitions of overexposed
art (even things with a dubious place in art museums like motorcycles
and guitars). In settings like that, looking at works of art is
becoming a point-and-click sort of thing. There's a crowd flowing
around you, noise . . . glance, move on."
Los Angeles
Times 12/28/00
WHAT
MUSEUMS SHOULD BE? "If the first
current idea informing much cultural planning is a version of technological
determinism, then the second is a belief in the increasing convergence
of commerce and culture. In this version of futurology, shops are
becoming more like museums - places for visual and aesthetic display
- while museums are becoming more like shops."
The Telegraph (London) 12/16/00
POPULARITY
KILLED THE MUSEUM? "Are museums going
to hell in a touring exhibition of hand baskets? Is buzz a thing
to be feared in a place of high culture?" Directors of Boston's
Museum of Fine Arts and the Harvard Museums debate buzz and bang-for-the-buck.
Boston Herald 12/15/00
BIGGER
IS BETTER? "Nowadays,
museums build bigger buildings and erect huge impersonal additions
to house uneven collections. Trustees, millionaires and board members
pick architects; they help lay out loading docks. Museums are becoming
architectural attractions in and of themselves. But is bigger better?
Is more more?" Artnet.com
12/08/00
THREE-RING
MUSEUM: "Considering
the Guggenheim’s latest proposal, to appropriate a sizable portion
of lower Manhattan for the purpose of creating a mammoth fun-and-games
cultural emporium: The Guggenheim Museum is itself no longer a serious
art institution. It has no aesthetic standards and no aesthetic
agenda. It has completely sold out to a mass-market mentality that
regards the museum’s own art collection as an asset to be exploited
for commercial purposes."
New York Observer 12/06/00
SCHOLARSHIP
TAKES A BACK SEAT: The British Museum’s redesign is certain
to drive up attendance and draw viewers who care more about the
architecture than the collection. "A more fundamental question,
however, is how much the museum's rush to modernize itself will
threaten its scholarly mission." New York Times 12/06/00
(one-time registration required for access)
WHAT
MUSEUMS WANT: What exactly do museums want today? New York's
fall schedule of shows at major museums is perplexing. "The
lineup of fall shows suggests that museum professionals, driven
by the desire to be financially secure, wildly popular or socially
relevant, opt for one of two alternatives: exhibitions that look
like upscale stores, or exhibitions that look like historical society
displays." New York Times 12/03/00 (one-time registration
required for access)
WHAT
HAPPENS IF NOBODY WANTS THE JOB? Before London's Victoria
& Albert Museum selected its new director last week, headhunters
had offered the job to several international candidates, but had
been turned down. "It is known they encouraged quite a number
of people to apply from all over the world. It subtly undermines
the candidature in the end." The Independent (London) 02/11/01
- JONESING
FOR THE V&A: Many believe that the Victoria & Albert
Museum needs a charismatic figure to pull it out of a prolonged
slump. But Mark Jones, named last week as new director, "is
seen as a subtle networker, a scholarly figure, adept at behind-the-scenes
politicking but unlikely to stamp his personality on the V&A
in a radical shake-up. Yet that is exactly what some critics
claim is needed to save the 149-year-old museum from dwindling
attendances and a nightmarishly bureaucratic way of working."
The Guardian (London) 02/13/01
- THE
TASK OF REINVENTION: Mark Jones, director of the National
Museums of Scotland, was appointed Monday to head London’s Victoria
& Albert - a museum with flagging admissions, a stalled
£80 million redesign, and an obvious need for artistic leadership.
"His next task is to polish this Victorian jewel and make
it appeal to the modern eye. A museum cannot ossify and be left
to decay. It has to reinvent itself." The Herald (Glasgow)
2/07/01
BRITISH
MUSEUM MIGHT CHARGE: The
British Museum has warned the government it might start charging
admission for the first time in its history if the museum doesn't
get some help with a large VAT tax bill.
London Evening Standard 02/08/01
THE
MODERN MUSEUM...ER, FUN HOUSE:
Time was when art museums were temples of decorum, staid, stately
and places in which to be contemplative. "But the “blockbuster”
mentality that began developing in the 1960s helped to transform
many art museums into all-purpose cultural emporia. Increasingly,
success is measured by quantity, not quality, by the take at the
box office rather than at the bar of aesthetic discrimination."
New Criterion 02/01
BASQUE
BOOST: The Bilbao Guggenheim
has transformed Bilbao since it opened three years ago. The museum
has had 3,625,000 visitors to the museum since October 1997, while
5,000 jobs were created and $600 million’s worth of economic activity
was generated." The
Art Newspaper 02/02/01
SPENDING
THAT MERGER MONEY: Two America Online executives have pledged
$30 million to the Corcoran Gallery in Washington, D.C., a record
donation for the 132-year-old museum. The money virtually assures
construction of the Corcoran's new Frank Gehry-designed addition,
expected to cost $120 million. Washington Post 02/05/01
MAJOR
COLLABORATION: The Hermitage
Museum in St Petersburg, the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna
and the Guggenheim Foundation have announced a collaboration that
seems to go beyond what museums have done so far. The accord would
involve exchanges of exhibitions, curators and know-how.
The Art Newspaper
01/26/01
WORLD
DOMINATION? "The response
of the guardians of the American museum world is to cry "McGuggenheim!",
and claim that Thomas Krens, the management-trained director of
the New York Guggenheim, is rolling out the brand. The tie-up with
the Hermitage and Kunsthistorisches are just part of a wider strategy
for what looks increasingly like a bid by Krens for world domination."
The Guardian 01/27/01
FUROR
OVER FREE MUSEUMS: So British
museums are to be free again? "In the 1980s, when museum charges
were encouraged by the government of the day as part of a market-driven
economy, museums and their collections were regarded as commodities.
And the result? Those institutions that went down the charging route
saw their visitor numbers plummet on average by a third. This approach
failed to take account of the unique importance of museums: they
are a crucial part of the fabric of the individual and of society,
and everyone should have free access to them." The
Guardian (London) 01/27/01
TOO
FAMOUS FOR ITS OWN (AND OTHERS) GOOD:
The "Mona Lisa" is being moved to a room of its own at
the Louvre due to the mobs that crowd its current spot, which shows
the painting in context among other works of the Italian High Renaissance.
The Louvre has had to admit that there are limits to this approach
and to place bullet-proof glass over the painting; and now it has
ruefully accepted another failure that comes from celebrity, and
it is removing the work to a raucous room of its own."
The
Independent (London) 1/26/01
DOUBLE
TROUBLE: London's Royal
Academy is going to double in size, taking over an adjacent building.
But a plan to move the Academy's students to new quarters is being
panned by the students. Why do the artists like their present ramshackle
digs, through which many famous artists have passed? “They boast
the most perfect light in which to work." The
Times (London) 01/26/01
PORTRAIT
OF THE COMMUTER AS AN ARTWORK:
Billboards have sprung up in Los Angeles declaring stretches
of clogged freeways and cookie-cutter retail stores to be works
of living art. The oversized labels are part of a promotional campaign
by L.A.'s Museum of Contemporary Art. Desperate? Maybe. Lowbrow
posing as highbrow? Perhaps. But people are talking about it.
L.A. Weekly 1/24/01
THE
POPULAR SMITHSONIAN: A record 3.1 million people visited the
museums of the Smithsonian last year, a 9 percent increase over
1999, when 28.6 million people visited. The heavy traffic flow reflects
a strong tourism economy, not to mention some popular Smithsonian
exhibits, such as the Salvador Dali show at the Hirshhorn last spring
and the Vikings display at the Museum of Natural History. Washington
Post 01/23/01
ART
CRISIS IN AUSTRALIA? Eighteen major Australian visual arts organizations
met in Sydney for emergency talks on the state of the visual arts
sector in Australia. "Cash-strapped state galleries are being
forced to stage more 'blockbuster' exhibitions at the expense of
Australian content and curatorial quality, while contemporary art
spaces were also suffering as a result of static funding. Art colleges
were closing courses or cancelling subjects because of funding cuts,
which in turn affected the number of teaching jobs available for
artists." The Age (Melbourne) 01/23/01
WE'RE
AWARE WE'RE HERE: The Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art
has hired giant ad agency TWBA\Chiat\Day, the firm responsible for
Absolut Vodka’s art-friendly ads, the Energizer Bunny, Apple’s “Think
Different” campaign and “Yo Quiero Taco Bell” to create an "awareness
campaign" for the museum. "Over the next month or so,
and continuing through June, MOCA’s 2001 Brand Awareness Campaign
will position 60 site-specific labels as billboards throughout the
city. LA Weekly 01/18/01
PANDERING?
"Art museums these days are pandering to the lowest common
denominator, confusing popular junk with high art, and failing their
mission to set standards and educate the public. Or they're throwing
over outdated and elitist concepts about art, making it fun, bringing
more people into museums, and teaching them to see beauty in everyday
objects. Either the barbarians are at the gate, or they're already
in, and, hey, they're not barbarians."
USA Today 01/05/01
THE
NEW MUSEUM: The Guggenheim's Thomas Krens
on criticisms of the museum's Armani show: "We’ve expanded
the concept of what a museum/gallery is. You have to be flexible
today. I see a museum as a research and education institution, as
well as a theme park - I say theme park not in a pejorative manner.
People come here for a visceral experience. I’m involved with objects
of material culture - that’s about everything. So then you choose
a hierarchy. "We look at the high practitioners in the field
of material culture, be it motorbikes, paintings or clothes. Clothes
and motorbikes have not got a frame around them but they reflect
the aspirations of culture in an age of globalisation."
The Scotsman 01/08/01
THE
ART OF SELLING ART: "Art galleries
often appear to be nothing more than underutilized museums, but
their real purpose is to sell art. Compared with other retailers,
they are spectacularly bad at what they do. Most people don't go
to galleries, and thanks to the snobbery and traditionalism of some
dealers, artists cannot effectively connect with the vast American
public and its equally vast purchasing power. Art galleries sell
art in the way that fancy stores sell luxury goods: they use high
prices to suggest scarcity, quality and prestige."
New York Times 01/07/01 (one-time
registration required for access)
FASHIONABLE
ART: The Guggenheim's show on Armani fashion is indicative of
a shift in perception of fashion as art. The show "is a perfect
example of the blend of fashion, art, commerce and academic analysis
that marks the current cultural scene. How we dress now is a subject
that engages semioticians, social historians, political analysts
and gender theorists - 'fashion civilians', in the words of Colette's
biographer Judith Thurman - as well as superstar designers, magazine
editors, high-spending celebrities, and chic purveyors and curators
of front-line style." London
Review of Books 01/14/01
SPILLOVER
POPULARITY? London's new
museums have been such a hit with audiences that elsewhere in England
museums with construction projects are busy revising upwards their
attendance projections. The
Guardian (London) 01/04/01
CYNICAL
BLOCKBUSTERS: "The
art exhibition has become one of our favourite treats. Orgies of
hype and merchandising, blockbuster shows are the cultural equivalent
of a royal wedding or the World Cup - spectacles that make us feel
part of a community of chat, deciding that yes, we really do all
feel that late Monet is as fascinating if not more so than the Monet
of the 1870s. Last year hardly a week went by without the opening
of some absolutely unmissable show, and this year the procession
rolls on, genuflecting before one modern or ancient master after
another." The
Guardian (London) 01/01/01
SO
WHAT CONSTITUTES ART? The
Los Angeles County Museum's show on California has been faulted
for emphasizing history and pop culture as much as art. "Museums,
like other institutions, are trying to make things relevant. The
show cuts a broad path through the cultural landscape, touching
on everything from surfboards to WWII Japanese internment camps,
as well as the varying manifestations of spirituality. "It's
all been a part of the growing democratization of the arts. Today
you can say a word like 'multicultural' and people recognize it;
you don't have to explain it anymore."
Christian Science Monitor 12/29/00
A
LITTLE SHOW BIZ IN BROOKLYN:
The Brooklyn Museum had a reputation for its rich collection and
stodgy ways. Then three years ago Arnold Lehman arrived as director
and brought some show business to the place (including last year's
"Sensation" show). "Mr. Lehman makes no apologies
for his populist approach, saying that if the choice arose, he would
have no trouble favoring a broader audience over deeper scholarly
research, while bearing in mind that the mission of the museum is
always about art." New
York Times 01/01/01
(one-time registration required for access)
THE
NORTON SIMON WAKES UP:
"Long known as a sleepy, essentially private enclave and only
open four afternoons a week, the Simon has been transformed during
the past year, since the grand opening of a celebrated $6.5-million
renovation designed by architect Frank O. Gehry. Officials have
extended its hours, expanded its outreach and upped its advertising
budget. The payoff has been dramatic."
Los Angeles
Times 12/03/00
HOME
|
|