|
|
Digital
Music/Copyright
|
|
|
Digital
Music/Copyright stories for 2000
- PAY-TO-PLAY:
Now that the fun has been sued out of Napster, music companies
of all stripes are jumping into the online music business. Just
in the last week several big players have entered the pay-to-play
business, each with their own variation on paid downloads.
The Globe & Mail (Canada) 04/06/01
- CANADIANS
LOVE THEIR (FREE) MUSIC: So where are all those Napster
users coming from? No. 1 is Canada and Spain. "On-line
surfers in Canada and Spain spent an average of 6.3 days in
February visiting the Napster site to download or upload digital
music files, according to research firm Jupiter. They were ahead
of Napster users in the United States, Argentina and Germany,
who spent an average 6.1 days, 6 days and 5.9 days, respectively.
The global average was 5.9 days." Globe
& Mail (Canada) 04/06/01
- WHAT'S
THE MUSICIANS' INTEREST? Surprise surprise - musicians tell
the US Congress that record company lawsuits over Napster have
not served musicians' interests, and that the legal actions
bring more money to the companies, but do little to promote
musicians to a wider audience. The
Age (Melbourne) 04/05/01
-
NAPSTER
USE UP: "Napster saw traffic surge in the last week
of March, even as the Internet site scrambled to block trade
in copyrighted material, a study said on Wednesday."
Wired 04/04/01
-
SAYING
GNO TO GNUTELLA: The recording industry, flush from its
bloody victory over Napster, is now turning its attention
to Gnutella, a loosely-structured file-sharing service where
piracy is reportedly rampant. But stopping the swapping may
be harder even than it was with Napster. The
Plain Dealer (Cleveland) 04/05/01
- IN
THE ARTISTS’ INTEREST: The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee
held a hearing Tuesday into online copyright issues, both music
and publishing. Artists themselves testified that musicians’
interests - namely that they get paid for their work no matter
what - are getting obscured by the larger economic battle between
the recording industry and Napster. "As [we] sit here,
there is a Ping-Pong game going on over our head about business
models on the Internet when we do not know how our intellectual
property is going to be protected." Washington
Post (Reuters) 04/04/01
- TAKING
UP THE CAUSE: "Long-time foes of the recording industry,
the Consumer Electronics Association and the National Association
of Recording Merchandisers, are preparing to clash with the
music labels over consumer rights issues and unfair business
practices...They believe the recording industry has too much
of a competitive advantage in the distribution of digital music."
Wired 04/04/01
- JUMPING
THE GUN: The recording industry's plan to launch a new online
music subscription service with RealNetworks seems to have overlooked
one whopping issue: such a service would have to negotiate with
artists for the rights to distribute their work, or they could
find themselves shut down before they start. Inside.com
04/04/01
- LOCKING
IT UP: The recording industry is preparing to debut a new
system of copyright protection which would make it impossible
to "rip" tracks from a CD into digital MP3 files.
However, the system would also make the discs unplayable on
many CD players, which might not go over well with consumers.
Inside.com 03/27/01
- NAPSTER
HITS BACK: Napster has filed court documents claiming that
the recording industry is intentionally making it difficult
for them to filter copyrighted music. "While Napster engineers
have added 200,000 musicians along with 1.2 million file names
into its filter, the...industry has sent over incomplete lists
of artists and songs that leave Napster to sort through hundreds
of thousands of files." Wired
03/23/01
- THE
WHINING CONTINUES: The recording industry plans to file
a complaint in federal court next week that Napster is not adequately
complying with the court's order to filter copyrighted material.
Napster says they're doing their best, and that the lists of
songs provided to them are "riddled with errors."
BBC 03/22/01
- BIG
BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU: The recording industry has been
threatening to attack online music piracy (Napster-style swapping)
"at the source," meaning the user doing the downloading,
rather than the company facilitating it. A new report claims
to have screen shots of an unobtrusive program that tracks the
movements of individual users who are illegally transferring
copyrighted material. The Register
03/22/01
-
BUT
IT'S REALLLLLY HARD! Napster is complaining that complying
with the court order to block all access to copyrighted
material on its song-swapping service is turning out to
be, well, every bit as difficult as everyone had expected
it to be. The recording industry is, understandably, not
terribly sympathetic. Wired
03/21/01
-
WORLDWIDE
WEBCASTING: The big problem of streaming audio and video
on the web is that such webcasts cross international boundaries,
and require multiple sets of legal permissions. "To
figure out what licensing agreements a business needs to
launch a legal, digital music company is like searching
for the beginning of an M.C. Escher painting –- everywhere
you look, it seems like you've found the start of the maze,
until you look somewhere else." Wired
03/17/01
-
IF NOT NAPSTER… Digital song-swapping is down almost
60% since Napster introduced its filters Wednesday to block
copyrighted material, with the number of downloads per individual
user down from 172 files each to 71. But "anecdotal
evidence already indicates that users were switching to
other peer-to-peer song-swap systems. It is only going to
be a matter of days before Napster users start migrating
to those systems in large numbers." Inside.com 3/15/01
- HAVING
YOUR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO: Having successfully crippled
Napster (at least partially), record labels are turning
to coopting the song-swapper's mission, and preparing
to launch their own streaming/downloading sites. Wired
03/16/01
- IX-NAY
ON THE EVER-CLAY ICKS-TRAY: The website "Aimster"
has removed, at Napster's request, a program that allowed
users to translate song titles into Pig Latin to circumvent
filtering software designed to stop illegal downloads.
Nando Times (AP) 03/15/01
-
THIS
MESSAGE WILL SELF-DESTRUCT... An Austin-based software
firm comprised largely of former intelligence agents has
developed the next generation of copy protection for online
media. The program works by taking control of your computer,
and disallowing the copying of trademarked material. Try
to hack the nearly invisible program, and it destroys itself,
and all your copyrighted files. No doubt, some 15-year-old
in Topeka is already working on how to crack this one. Inside.com
03/13/01
-
NAPSTER
TO GET LEGAL: The CEO of Bertelsmann says Napster will
be relaunched in July and that "a re-launched Napster
will likely charge $2.95 to $4.95 a month for a basic service
and $5.95 to $9.95 for a premium service. Bertelsman, which
owns the BMG label, has invested in Napster as part of a
bid to convince music companies to drop their lawsuits and
support a 'legal' version of the service." Wired
03/12/01
-
GUILTY
PLEASURES: So Napster As We Know It is dead. The new
Napster is yet to come. By law, now, trading music files
without paying royaties is officially wrong. So how did
so many users decide that it wasn't? And what has the experience
done for the millions who participated? For some, it has
meant a guilt-free way of exploring the music they'd be
too embarrassed to buy at the store. Boston
Globe 03/13/01
-
FREE
FLOW: A group of programmers dedicated to keeping the
flow of free internet music going is hard at work on son-of-Napster,
which they say will circumvent the crackdown on Napster.
"The Freenet programme is similar to the popular Napster
file sharing software, but uses a different storage and
retrieval system which maintains no central index and does
not reveal where the files are stored." BBC
03/13/01
-
EXAGGERATED:
Napster has been shut down. No, it is being shut down. What
we mean is, it's in the process of being treated as if it
might eventually be in a position which someone with minimal
Internet skills might mistake for shut down. "So basically
Napster is still a free-for-all for everyone -- unless, that
is, you are a fan of Roy Orbison... much to the chagrin of
at least a couple Napster users, the service has started blocking
people who have Roy songs in their libraries."
Wired 03/09/01
-
END
RUN THROUGH NAPSTER: The judge may have ordered Napster
to start filtering out copyrighted songs, but Napster users
are resourceful. They're finding ways around the filters and
traffic is still robust. Inside.com
03/07/01
- BROTHER
AGAINST BROTHER: Don't think the other music retailers out
there on the web aren't cheering the looming demise of Napster.
In particular, EMusic, which has joined the list of companies
suing embattled song-swapper, is hoping that Napster's loss
will be its gain. Wired 03/08/01
-
NAPSTER
BITES: As ordered by a judge, the file loader has three
days to remove copyrighted songs from its trading lists. Or
else. Wired 03/06/01
- SPLIT
ENFORCEMENT: Judge rules recording industry must share responsibility
for monitoring copyrighted songs over the file-share service.
Inside.com 03/06/01
- WHO NEEDS WHOM? Free-music fans continue arguing
that Napster doesn’t harm the music industry; it actually serves
it well by letting consumers sample before they buy - and then
buy even more. "The music industry wouldn't last two weeks
without Napster." New
York Times 3/06/01 (one-time
registration required for access)
- MUSIC
CONTINUES FLOWING: Napster had promised it was going to
start filtering out copyrighted music this weekend. But "all
the top 10 songs listed on the Billboard Hot 100 list were available
on the company's servers late yesterday, including the No 1
Stutter by Joe featuring Mystikal. Songs by longtime Napster
foe Metallica also showed up in searches." The
Age (Melbourne) 03/05/01
- NAPSTER
CLONE? As Napster's wings get clipped, a Canadian entrepreneur
prepares to "clone" Napster's program and base it
off the coast of Britain, where he believes it will be untouchable
by meddling authorities. The Globe
& Mail (Canada) 03/05/01
- GETTING
AROUND A CRIPPLED NAPSTER: Millions of music fans jammed
onto Napster's servers this weekend to try and beat court-imposed
filtering out of copyrighted songs. Alternative music file-trading
services also had big surges of users as traders explored alternative
means of getting music they wanted. Dallas
Morning News (AP) 03/04/01
- NAPSTER
LOSES - WILL BEGIN FILTERING SONGS: The recording industry
and motion picture association have succeeded in lawsuits against
Napster and MP3.com under provisions in the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act. This weekend Napster will begin filtering out
copyrighted songs available through its service. Wired
03/02/01
- RIAA
GETS SERIOUS: The recording industry is enlisting the support
of top Republican politicians as it prepares for what record
company execs hope will be the final charge against Napster.
Wired 02/27/01
- NAPSTER
& CD SALES: Has Napster hurt sales of compact disks
in the US? That's what recording execs are claiming. Sales of
CD singles have fallen (even though the industry made more money
than ever last year). BBC 02/27/01
- IT
ISN'T GOING AWAY: Even as Napster prepares for its next
court date, countless other music-on-demand services try to
come up with new ways of picking up where Napster may be forced
to leave off. What's legal seems fairly fluid, and entrepeneurs
want to be prepared to take advantage of any loopholes they
find. Wired 02/27/01
- THE
PLOT THICKENS: A German newspaper is reporting that a Napster-like
song-swapping service that was beta-tested earlier this month
was in fact designed by the Bertelsmann record group, in preparation
for the possibility of a Napster shutdown. Inside.com
02/26/01
- WHY
THE FIGHT OVER NAPSTER MATTERS: "Suggested revenue
models for making money on the Net trickle up from the software
industry: you give away the intellectual property, then make
your money in services and customization. These models simply
don't make sense when talking about a great riff, an evocative
piece of photojournalism or a work of fiction good enough to
anthologize in the world of dead trees. Art is not information.
Art is precisely that which can last and last — whereas nothing
dates faster than a revision to a piece of software."
The New York Times 02/23/01
(one-time registration required for access)
- PURE
NAKED GREED? Why were recording companies so quick to turn
down Napster's offer to pay them $1 billion? "While the
money sounds like a huge chunk of change for the recording industry
to pass up, that's exactly what several label executives have
said. The reason: The economics of the system don't add up."
Wired 02/23/01
- COMPETITION:
Music giants Vivendi Universal and Sony are starting their
own music-file sharing service. "The news is a fresh
blow to Napster which is trying to reach a compromise with
the record firms after losing a legal case about copyright."
BBC 02/23/01
- CHUMP
CHANGE? Trying desperately to stay alive, Napster offered
the recording industry $1 billion this week. But the offer has
been swiftly rejected: "It is Napster's responsibility to come
to the creative community with a legitimate business model and
a system that protects our artists and copyrights. Nothing we
have heard in the past and nothing we have heard today suggests
they have yet been able to accomplish that task." Variety
02/21/01
- NAKED
PLOY FOR SYMPATHY: "You could, perhaps, call Napster's
latest machinations the death throes of a company in the
last minutes of life; but this final rally could also be
interpreted as a savvy attempt to pull the record industry's
strings by gaining public sympathy. If the record labels
don't accept the billion, don't they end up looking like
killjoys determined to put an end to music sharing once
and for all?" Salon 02/21/01
- NAPSTER WILL
NO LONGER BE FREE:
With all that money going out, Napster hopes to bring more in
by charging for on-line file exchange -- from $5.95 to $9.95
for unlimited downloads. But questions remain, such as "whether
Napster users will be willing to pay, whether the company will
be able to build the technology to securely transfer files,
and whether the record companies will go along." The New York Times 02/21/01
(one-time registration required for access)
- NAPSTER
OFFERS SETTLEMENT: Napster, under threat of being shut down
and bankrupted by the courts, offers the recording industry
$1 billion to drop their lawsuits. The company says it is "willing
to pay $150 million per year in licensing fees to major record
companies and $50 million per year in fees to independent labels
and artists." Wired 02/20/01
- FIGHTING
FOR SURVIVAL: "Napster said that for months the
company has pitched the record labels on a model that would
split subscription revenues with 64 percent going to the
labels and 36 percent going to Napster." When the labels
turned down the deal, Napster decided to guarantee the cash.
Inside.com 02/20/0
- CREATING
THE FUTURE: The digital-music industry continues to grow
at an ever-increasing rate, and the debate is on over what will
become the consumer standards for the medium. Security is important,
as is convenience, and several companies are banking on the
potential of a secure streaming service called Bridgeport, which
has the potential to solve many of the problems that currently
plague online music. Wired 02/20/01
-
DUELING
EDITORIALS
- The
New York Times:"The Internet is a revolutionary
medium whose long-term benefits we are only beginning to
fathom. But that is no reason to allow it to become a duty-
free zone where people can plunder the intellectual property
of others without paying for it." 02/18/01
(one-time registration required
for access)
- Minneapolis
Star-Tribune: "The prevailing view of Napster,
reinforced by last week's court ruling, paints it as a digital
burglary tool that scofflaw youngsters can use to grab free
music and beat musicians out of royalties. This is a convenient
oversimplification by the recording industry, whose archaic
business model is as big a reason as any for the success
of the Internet music-swapping services it is trying to
shut down." 02/19/01
- Toronto
Globe & Mail: "We've used Napster to explore,
educate ourselves and chase down obscurities -- areas either
badly served by the companies, or not served at all. Napster
gives you access to music at the speed of intellect. I can
recall more than once a quick download settling a musical
argument." 02/20/01
-
WHY
RUIN THE PARTY? All the record-company high-fives the
other day over their appeals-court judgment against Napster
looks like a Jurassic convention of brontosauri celebrating
the death of the first mammal. They may not have noticed
how few of the critters scuttling around at their feet share
their enthusiasm." Globe
& Mail (Canada) 02/19/01
- WHY
ARE WE SO FASCINATED WITH NAPSTER? It raises fundamental
questions about art and the ownership of creative work. "What
is the appropriate relationship between the artist and fan base?
Is the capitalist model the right model for creating art? What
is copyright for? And what is art for in a consumer society?"
The New York Times 02/19/01 (one-time
registration required for access)
- STOP
ROMANTICIZING NAPSTER: Time to stop romanticizing the Big
Guy/Little Guy struggle between Napster and its users and the
big recording companies. "The much-posited notion that
'the internet is the new punk' is soon destined to follow its
discredited predecessors 'brown is the new black' and 'poetry
is the new rock'n'roll' into the dustbin of history. For the
simple reasons that true cultural upheavals are not about delivery
systems, they are about content." The
Telegraph (London) 02/17/01
- NAPSTER'S
PLAN TO GET LEGAL: Napster reveals its plans to retool.
"But, as Napster acknowledges, the restructuring of its
architecture will not answer the demands by the recording industry
that it block songs whose copyright holders do not want them
to appear on the service. Napster presented the new features
as the initial moves in a series of alterations that will, company
management hopes, ultimately transform the file-swapping service
into a valuable - and profitable - part of the music industry."
Inside 02/16/01
- NAPSTER:
THE POLICE STEP IN: So far in the US, the Napster controversy
has been confined to the courtroom. In Belgium, however, it's
gone a step further. "[P]olice have raided the homes of
users of music-sharing websites looking for evidence they infringed
copyright rules.... the searches were part of an investigation
of the Internet site mp3blast.com."
Salon (AP) 02/15/01
- KIDS
VS THE GROWNUPS? "According to a recent survey by Family
PC magazine, one out of three teens ages 12 to 17 download songs
through Napster. The proportion of college students is considerably
higher. Young people have gotten used to doing whatever they
want to do on the Internet. Until Napster blew up, they didn't
understand they could be regulated." Now they're considering
what to do. Washington Post 02/16/01
- NAPSTER'S FINANCIAL
PERILS: It's not just the judges' ruling giving Napster
a reprieve that the company has to worry about. If recording
companies continue to pursue Napster, the copyright violation
fines could bankrupt the service. "Statutory damages could
quickly add up to big bucks. A federal judge in New York ruled
last year, for instance, that MP3.com was liable for $25,000
in damages for each CD copied. It's extremely likely that Napster
will have a very large financial judgment against them."
Wired 02/13/01
- END
OF THE LINE? Napster execs
say they don't know whether they can continue the company given
restrictions imposed by Federal judges Monday. The
New York Times 02/14/01 (one-time
registration required for access)
- NO LEGISLATIVE
RELIEF: The US Congress could make Napster's problems go
away by passing legislation aimed for for new digital realities.
But "I don't think you're going to see legislation in the
Congress.... We just spent years trying to get things right.
Things are changing much too fast for us to jump in and try
to get it right a second time."
Wired 02/13/01
- THE
REAL GENIUS OF NAPSTER: "Napster is considerably more
than an online shoplifting service. What Napster has done is
to provide access, from any Internet connection, to nearly every
recording anyone could want. Napster hasn't copied or accumulated
those recordings. It searches the ad hoc network of people using
Napster at any moment and, like a card catalog or a virtual
bulletin board, it simply helps people find the music they seek.
By doing so, Napster provides something that for many listeners
is even more desirable than free tunes: access."
The New York Times 02/14/01
(one-time registration required for
access)
- COURT
TO NAPSTER - STOP: A US appeals court rules against the
music-sharing service. But Napster lead counsel David Boies
stressed that, "in his view, the court was saying that
'the Napster architecture does not have to be redesigned,' and
that Napster need only police its files 'within the limits of
its system.' If so, then the ruling really might not be the
catastrophe that it seemed on first glance."
Inside.com 02/12/01
- HANGING
BY A THREAD: "The court is requiring that Napster be
notified in advance that it is in violation of copyright in
particular cases, and if Napster refuses to bar transmission
of the songs across the Napster network, it will then be in
violation - and will be shut down."
Salon 02/13/01
- RESISTANCE
IS FERTILE: Napster opponents may have won in court, but
online resistance to the commercial recording industry is growing.
"With every song they tell Napster to remove, the political
resistance to this extreme view of copyright law will grow stronger."
The New York Times 03/13/01 (one-time
registration required for access)
- SO
MUCH FOR THE NAPSTER EFFECT: Sales of recorded music in
Australia rose again last year (mirroring sales figures in the
US) despite free digital sharing of music over the internet.
"In Australia, CD sales rose by 2.9 per cent to almost
43 million, while vinyl continued its comeback, with sales increasing
by 23 per cent to 37,400 records, according to Australian Recording
Industry Association figures." The
Age (Melbourne) 02/13/01
- FIDDLING
WHILE ROME BURNED: In theory, it makes a lot of sense for
the recording industry to set standards to combat music piracy.
But the Secure Digital Music Initiative (SDMI) is in trouble,
with one of its major proposals finding nearly no support from
the industry it is supposed to help, and another facing major
delays. "These setbacks have contributed substantially
to the dearth of unambiguously legal music online. The big record
labels have refrained from releasing much music on the Net until
they feel confident they can protect their copyrights. As a
result, the landscape continues to be littered with trial projects
and start-ups failing for lack of access to the most popular
music." ZDNet,
01/24/01
- NAPSTER
KAYOED: A US appeals court has ruled against the music-file
trading service Napster. "The court ruled that "Napster,
by its conduct, knowingly encourages and assists the infringement
of plaintiffs' copyrights." The recording industry was
understandably thrilled with the decision." Wired
02/12/01
- LAST
MINUTE TRADING: Napster was swamped this weekend (some
10,000 users at any one time) as music fans spent the weekend
madly copying music files just in case a US court shuts
down the service Monday. "A three-judge panel of the
9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco will issue
its ruling on Monday on the recording industry's request
that Napster be ordered to stop enabling users to swap songs
for free." Wired 02/11/01
- FAIR
USE: Napster has already made a deal with music giant
Bertelsmann. "For obvious reasons, media moguls and
teenage music fans are watching the deal closely. But so
should everyone who writes or creates for a living: we are
about to witness a live test of whether technology can protect
digital intellectual property." Columbia
Journalism Review 02/01
- WHAT
HAPPENED TO THE "EVIL" NAPSTER? Last year they
were all trying to sue the upstart music file trader out of
existence. This year they can't wait to make a deal. TVT Records,
one of the largest of the "independent" record labels,
has agreed to a partnership with Napster, and dropped its
lawsuit against the Internet music service. TVT becomes the
third label to break ranks and join forces with the embattled
Napster, following the Bertelsmann and Edel labels.
BBC
01/25/01
Digital
Music/Copyright stories for 2000
HOME
|
|