Hermetic? Uningratiating?
That’s what Holland Cotter of the NY Times today called the 2008 edition of the Whitney Biennial. In my WNYC commentary, airing yesterday, I called it “fun.” And in my initial CultureGrrl quick take, I called it “endearing.” I do agree with Holland that this is art for hard times. Just like the art in the Unmonumental show at the recently reopened New Museum, it’s about making beauty, or at least something strangely compelling, out of dross and detritus.
Therein lies the core of the show’s “wit,” as I’ve called it.
Maybe the best way to make this case is to take you on a quick tour of a few works that engaged me and made me smile. (For photos from the underwhelming off-site installations at the Park Avenue Armory, to which I’ve mercifully given short shrift, go here.)
Everybody’s talkin’ ’bout Phoebe Washburn‘s “While Enhancing a Diminishing Deep Down Thirst, the Juice Broke Loose (the Birth of a Soda Shop).” (After you say all that, what more can you say?) It was accorded the power spot for installations at the Whitney—the light-filled space near the off-kilter window:
I like Phoebe’s non-interpretation better. Here’s a close-up of the front side:
Inside this barnlike structure are a series of video vignettes showing
longhaired sisters engaged in farming like you’ve never seen it
before—milking not only goats but also their own tresses, and performing strange agricultural cult rituals with the utmost concentration
and earnestness. I thought it was hilarious, although the label told me that I was supposed to see this as an exploration of larger societal issues, such as
labor and class inequities. It was so entertaining that it was
impossible to take that seriously.
And now for the beauty part—My photo does not do justice to Jedediah Caesar‘s luciously textured
and colorful amalgams of found objects encased in resin:
A more fragile beauty—Mitzi Pederson‘s “Untitled (ten years later or maybe just one),” is a construction of cinderblocks trimmed with glitter, so precariously balanced that I could hardly get the guard far enough out of the way for me to take this picture:
I knew better than to try to get all those schmoozing art critics and journalists to step aside. Does anyone go to press previews to look at the art?
Also much talked about, as much for the process as the product, is Charles Long‘s contribution, embodying this Biennial’s predilection for works exploiting the “degraded sublime,” as the label put it. Here we have one of Long’s ghostly photos of the marks made by the droppings of blue herons on the cement embankment of the Los Angeles River:
Veteran artist Mary Heilmann, given prominent, off-the-elevator placement at the Whitney, is also featured as one of two commissioned artists for the upcoming Armory Show. Here’s one of her Whitney-exhibited works:
I mentioned on the radio that this Biennial differs from previous versions in that there’s not much in the way of shock art or the overtly political. A conspicuous exception is “Divine Violence” by Daniel Joseph Martinez, a roomful of plaques inscribed with the names of groups seeking political change through violence. Here’s a detail:
For a broader view of that room, which includes an excellent profile portrait of David Resnicow, president of the eponymous museum public relations firm, Resnicow Schroeder, see the image on above-linked Holland Cotter review. I’m sure David will be ordering a print.
During the limited time of the press preview, I could only flit among the videos, not take the time to do them justice. Cotter’s review indicates that the shock art or strong political statements to be found in this Biennial are largely confined to the screen. William Jones‘ display of police surveilance videos, showing homosexual encounters in public restrooms, is definitely not for children (as was apparent from the catalogue photos).
But for the best shock art in all New York, you must walk a few blocks north to the Metropolitan Museum’s marvelous Courbet exhibition, which is revealing in more ways than one: